Tare M, Parkington H C, Coleman H A
Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Br J Pharmacol. 2000 Jun;130(3):605-18. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703332.
The contribution of endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF), nitric oxide (NO) and a prostanoid (PG) to endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization and relaxation were assessed in coronary and mammary arteries of guinea-pigs by integration of the responses evoked during discrete applications of acetylcholine (ACh). The results of this integration approach were compared with those using traditional peak analysis methods. N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 100 microM) and indomethacin (1 microM), alone or in combination, were without effect on peak hyperpolarizations or relaxations while they markedly reduced the integrated responses in both arteries. Integrated responses attributed to NO and PG were larger than those attributed to EDHF in the coronary artery (at 2 microM ACh, hyperpolarization (mV s): NO, 4200+/-91; PG, 5046+/-157; EDHF, 1532+/-94; relaxation (mN s mm(-1)): NO, 2488+/-122; PG, 2234+/-96; EDHF, 802+/-54). Integrated responses attributed to NO, PG and EDHF were similar in the mammary artery (at 2 microM ACh, hyperpolarization: NO, 347+/-69; PG, 217+/-49; EDHF, 310+/-63; relaxation: NO, 462+/-94; PG, 456+/-144; EDHF, 458+/-40). Gilbenclamide (1 microM) all but abolished the hyperpolarization attributable to NO and PG but not EDHF in both arteries allowing assessment of the role of the hyperpolarization in relaxation. Gilbenclamide was without effect on the integrated relaxation due to NO but significantly reduced the relaxation associated with PG in the two arteries. In conclusion, integration of the responses enabled a more complete assessment of the contribution of EDHF, NO and PG to endothelium-dependent responses, which were strikingly different in the two arteries. There is commonality in the role of hyperpolarization in relaxation in both arteries: EDHF-dependent relaxation is strongly dependent on hyperpolarization; hyperpolarization plays an important role in PG relaxation, whereas it has a small facilitatory role in NO-dependent relaxation.
通过整合豚鼠冠状动脉和乳腺动脉在离散应用乙酰胆碱(ACh)期间诱发的反应,评估内皮源性超极化因子(EDHF)、一氧化氮(NO)和前列腺素(PG)对内皮依赖性超极化和舒张的作用。将这种整合方法的结果与使用传统峰值分析方法的结果进行比较。N(ω)-硝基-L-精氨酸甲酯(L-NAME,100μM)和吲哚美辛(1μM)单独或联合使用时,对峰值超极化或舒张均无影响,但它们显著降低了两条动脉的整合反应。在冠状动脉中,归因于NO和PG的整合反应大于归因于EDHF的反应(在2μM ACh时,超极化(mV·s):NO,4200±91;PG,5046±157;EDHF,1532±94;舒张(mN·s·mm⁻¹):NO,2488±-122;PG,2234±96;EDHF,802±54)。在乳腺动脉中,归因于NO、PG和EDHF的整合反应相似(在2μM ACh时,超极化:NO,347±69;PG,217±49;EDHF,310±63;舒张:NO,462±9;-4;PG,456±144;EDHF,458±40)。格列本脲(1μM)几乎消除了两条动脉中归因于NO和PG的超极化,但对EDHF引起的超极化无影响,从而可以评估超极化在舒张中的作用。格列本脲对NO引起的整合舒张无影响,但显著降低了两条动脉中与PG相关的舒张。总之,整合反应能够更全面地评估EDHF、NO和PG对内皮依赖性反应的作用,这在两条动脉中显著不同。两条动脉中超极化在舒张中的作用具有共性:EDHF依赖性舒张强烈依赖于超极化;超极化在PG舒张中起重要作用,而在NO依赖性舒张中起较小的促进作用。