Werner C W, Pereira A C, Eklund S A
Methodist University of Piracicaba, Lins School of Dentistry, SP, Brazil.
ASDC J Dent Child. 2000 Mar-Apr;67(2):93-7, 82.
A nonprofit private dental clinic provides free dental treatment for children up to the age of eighteen years. In order to expand its services to reach more children, a school-based sealant program using dental auxiliary personnel was organized. This paper evaluated the performance of the school-based program during 1991 by comparing the costs of the school-based program with the costs of the sealants placed in the clinic in twelve months. Costs were calculated based on 1991 expenditures, and effectiveness rates were estimated from dental literature on sealants. The cost of saving one tooth-surface from decaying within a six-year period at the school and the clinic was $65 and $42 with an average sealing time per tooth surface of 18 and 12.5 minutes, respectively. Despite the relatively lower cost of personnel, the school program cost was 35 percent higher than at the clinic. Nevertheless, if hidden costs, such as transportation, time off work, and waiting time for those attending the clinic were considered, costs could be comparable or even higher for the clinic. The main goal of this paper is to explore a methodology to compare programs of different nature, and critically evaluate the results.
一家非营利性私立牙科诊所为18岁以下儿童提供免费牙科治疗。为了扩大服务范围以惠及更多儿童,该诊所组织了一项由牙科辅助人员参与的校内窝沟封闭项目。本文通过比较1991年校内项目的成本与诊所12个月内窝沟封闭的成本,对该校内项目的表现进行了评估。成本是根据1991年的支出计算得出的,有效率则是根据有关窝沟封闭的牙科文献估算得出的。在学校和诊所,防止一颗牙齿表面在六年内龋坏的成本分别为65美元和42美元,每个牙齿表面的平均封闭时间分别为18分钟和12.5分钟。尽管校内项目的人员成本相对较低,但该项目的成本仍比诊所高出35%。然而,如果考虑到隐性成本,如交通、误工时间以及诊所就诊者的等待时间,诊所的成本可能与之相当甚至更高。本文的主要目的是探索一种方法来比较不同性质的项目,并严格评估结果。