Schaeper J P, Sepaniak M J
Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996-1600, USA.
Electrophoresis. 2000 Apr;21(7):1421-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(20000401)21:7<1421::AID-ELPS1421>3.0.CO;2-7.
It is well known that poor quantitative reproducibility substantially limits the practical implementation of capillary electrophoresis (CE) separations in chemical analysis. The principal sources of variance in observed peak areas are irreproducible flow rate, which influences on-column detector response, and inconsistent injection volume or amount. An overview of studies by researchers to address the reproducibility issue will be presented. In addition, current efforts in our laboratory to assess sources of quantitative variance for separations of dansylated amino acids using an automated CE system are presented and related when appropriate to the body of existing knowledge on this important topic. A comparison of different injection methods (hydrostatic vs. electrokinetic) and approaches (e.g., high vs. low pressure), the effect of random changes in electroosmotic flow (EOF) due to air bubbles in the CE capillary, and choice of certain peak integration parameters in terms of peak area reproducibility are presented. Under optimum conditions relative standard deviation (RSD) values in raw peak area are typically 2.0%. With nonoptimum conditions (e.g., with air bubbles in capillary), RSD values can substantially degrade. However, normalizing with retention times, internal standards, or observed electrophoretic current produces RSD values in a range of 1.4-2.3%.
众所周知,较差的定量重现性极大地限制了毛细管电泳(CE)分离技术在化学分析中的实际应用。观察到的峰面积变化的主要来源是流速不可重现,这会影响柱上检测器的响应,以及进样体积或进样量不一致。本文将概述研究人员为解决重现性问题所做的研究。此外,还介绍了我们实验室目前使用自动CE系统评估丹磺酰化氨基酸分离定量变化来源的工作,并在适当时与关于这一重要主题的现有知识体系相关联。本文还比较了不同的进样方法(静水压进样与电动进样)和进样方式(例如,高压进样与低压进样),毛细管电泳(CE)毛细管中气泡导致的电渗流(EOF)随机变化的影响,以及某些峰积分参数对峰面积重现性的选择。在最佳条件下,原始峰面积的相对标准偏差(RSD)值通常为2.0%。在非最佳条件下(例如,毛细管中有气泡),RSD值可能会大幅下降。然而,用保留时间、内标或观察到的电泳电流进行归一化处理后,RSD值在1.4 - 2.3%的范围内。