Suppr超能文献

一份配有插图的宣传册决策辅助工具对前列腺癌筛查测试使用情况的影响。

The effect of an illustrated pamphlet decision-aid on the use of prostate cancer screening tests.

作者信息

Schapira M M, VanRuiswyk J

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Clement J. Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee 53295-1000, USA.

出版信息

J Fam Pract. 2000 May;49(5):418-24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer screening with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination (DRE) continues to increase. Our goal was to test the effect of a prostate cancer screening decision-aid on patients' knowledge, beliefs, and use of prostate cancer screening tests.

METHODS

Our study was a randomized controlled trial of a prostate cancer screening decision-aid consisting of an illustrated pamphlet as opposed to a comparison intervention. We included 257 men aged 50 to 80 years who were receiving primary care at a Department of Veterans Affairs Hospital in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The decision-aid provided quantitative outcomes of prostate cancer screening with DRE and PSA. We subsequently evaluated prostate cancer screening knowledge, beliefs, and test use.

RESULTS

The illustrated pamphlet decision-aid was effective in improving knowledge of prostate cancer screening tests: 95% of the experimental group were aware of the possibility of false-negative test results compared with 85% of the comparison group (P <.01). Ninety-one percent of the experimental group were aware of the possibility of a false-positive screening test result compared with 65% of the comparison group (P <.01). However, there was no difference in the use of prostate cancer screening between the experimental (82%) and comparison (84%) groups, (P >.05).

CONCLUSIONS

When used in a primary care setting, an illustrated pamphlet decision-aid was effective in increasing knowledge of prostate cancer screening tests but did not change the use of these tests.

摘要

背景

血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测和直肠指检(DRE)用于前列腺癌筛查的情况持续增加。我们的目标是测试前列腺癌筛查决策辅助工具对患者关于前列腺癌筛查检测的知识、信念及检测使用情况的影响。

方法

我们的研究是一项关于前列腺癌筛查决策辅助工具的随机对照试验,该工具为一本带插图的小册子,对照组采用的是对照干预措施。我们纳入了257名年龄在50至80岁之间、在威斯康星州密尔沃基市一家退伍军人事务医院接受初级保健的男性。该决策辅助工具提供了直肠指检和PSA前列腺癌筛查的定量结果。随后我们评估了前列腺癌筛查知识、信念及检测使用情况。

结果

带插图的小册子决策辅助工具在提高前列腺癌筛查检测知识方面有效:实验组95%的人知晓检测结果可能出现假阴性,而对照组这一比例为85%(P<.01)。实验组91%的人知晓筛查检测结果可能出现假阳性,而对照组这一比例为65%(P<.01)。然而,实验组(82%)和对照组(84%)在前列腺癌筛查的使用上没有差异(P>.05)。

结论

在初级保健环境中使用时,带插图的小册子决策辅助工具在增加前列腺癌筛查检测知识方面有效,但并未改变这些检测的使用情况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验