Suppr超能文献

游标尺线和融合锁定参数对注视差异的影响。

Effects of nonius line and fusion lock parameters on fixation disparity.

作者信息

Ukwade M T

机构信息

College of Optometry, University of Houston, Texas 77204-6052, USA.

出版信息

Optom Vis Sci. 2000 Jun;77(6):309-20. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200006000-00011.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Clinical devices for fixation disparity vary in the size and position of the nonius test-lines and in the location of the binocular fusion lock, and published results of studies comparing fixation disparity devices also vary. This study examined how varying stimulus parameters affects the magnitude of horizontal fixation disparity and the precision of nonius alignment in normal observers.

METHODS

Targets were bright vertical lines presented for 150 ms on an oscilloscope and viewed in the dark from 3.95 m through a mirror haploscope. The fusion stimulus was either central, peripheral, or central-plus-peripheral. Fixation disparity was measured for nonius lines with a fixed vertical separation and variable lengths, using the method of constant stimuli. In a second experiment, fixation disparity was assessed for vergence demands of 6delta base-in to 12delta base-out using nonius lines of fixed length and variable vertical separations. For comparison, binocular Vernier thresholds and constant errors were also assessed.

RESULTS

Mean values of fixation disparity are invariant with the length and separation of the nonius lines and proximity to the fusion lock, over the range of values tested. When measured with a central fusion lock, the precision of binocular nonius alignment (vergence variability) worsens if the separation between the nonius lines increases beyond approximately 20 min arc. Vergence variability is larger with a peripheral fusion lock for small nonius-line separations and approximately the same as with the central lock for large line separations. Fixation disparity and precision were smallest with a central-plus-peripheral fusion-lock combination. Similar effects of line length and separation were found for binocular Vernier.

CONCLUSIONS

The finding of invariance of fixation disparity with line length for nonius targets < 1degrees extends those of earlier findings for larger targets. Because the precision of binocular nonius alignment is poorer for large nonius-line separations or with a peripheral fusion lock, fixation disparity should be most repeatable when measured with a central fusion lock and nonius lines separated by 20 min arc or less. However, a peripheral fusion lock and small nonius-line separation may provide the most effective diagnostic combination for fixation disparity.

摘要

目的

用于测量注视差异的临床设备在视标测试线的大小和位置以及双眼融合锁定的位置上存在差异,并且比较注视差异设备的研究发表结果也各不相同。本研究探讨了变化的刺激参数如何影响正常观察者水平注视差异的大小和视标对齐的精度。

方法

目标是在示波器上呈现150毫秒的明亮垂直线,在黑暗中通过镜子式双眼镜从3.95米处观察。融合刺激可以是中央、周边或中央加周边的。使用恒定刺激法,对具有固定垂直间距和可变长度的视标线测量注视差异。在第二个实验中,使用固定长度和可变垂直间距的视标线,评估6棱镜底向内至12棱镜底向外的集合需求下的注视差异。为了进行比较,还评估了双眼游标阈值和恒定误差。

结果

在所测试的值范围内,注视差异的平均值与视标线的长度、间距以及与融合锁定的接近程度无关。当使用中央融合锁定进行测量时,如果视标线之间的间距增加超过约20分视角,则双眼视标对齐的精度(集合变异性)会变差。对于小视标线间距,周边融合锁定时的集合变异性更大,对于大视标线间距,其与中央融合锁定时大致相同。中央加周边融合锁定组合时,注视差异和精度最小。双眼游标也发现了类似的线长和间距效应。

结论

对于小于1度的视标,注视差异与线长无关的这一发现扩展了早期对较大视标研究的结果。由于对于大视标线间距或使用周边融合锁定时,双眼视标对齐的精度较差,因此当使用中央融合锁定且视标线间距为20分视角或更小进行测量时,注视差异应该是最可重复的。然而,周边融合锁定和小视标线间距可能为注视差异提供最有效的诊断组合。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验