Beldi G, Bosshard A, Hess O M, Althaus U, Walpoth B H
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Insel, Bern, Switzerland.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Jul;70(1):212-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01246-7.
Bloodflow measurements are of major clinical importance for quality control in vascular surgery. They allow detection of low-flow situations which may influence outcome adversely. The purpose of the present study was to validate three different flow systems for measuring absolute blood flow.
Measurements were performed in an experimental flow model using arteries and veins and blood or saline at two different temperatures. As a reference method true flow was measured by volume sampling.
Correlation coefficients between transit time flow and true flow measurements ranged between 0.71 and 0.92. Systematic overestimation and underestimation of transit time flow were observed, but after second-order correction all correlations were excellent, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 irrespective of flow medium and temperature.
Transit time flow measurements are exact and reproducible. Second-order correction yields good accuracy and high precision, with minimal differences among the three systems evaluated.
血流测量对于血管外科手术的质量控制具有重要的临床意义。它们能够检测出可能对手术结果产生不利影响的低血流情况。本研究的目的是验证三种不同的血流测量系统用于测量绝对血流。
在一个实验血流模型中,使用动脉、静脉以及血液或生理盐水在两种不同温度下进行测量。作为参考方法,通过体积采样测量真实血流。
通过渡越时间法测量的血流与真实血流测量之间的相关系数在0.71至0.92之间。观察到渡越时间法测量的血流存在系统性高估和低估,但经过二阶校正后,所有相关性均极佳,无论血流介质和温度如何,相关系数范围为0.93至0.95。
渡越时间法血流测量准确且可重复。二阶校正产生良好的准确性和高精度,在所评估的三种系统之间差异极小。