Ayoub A F, Millett D T, Hasan S
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Glasgow University Dental School and Canniesburn Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Aug;38(4):305-11. doi: 10.1054/bjom.2000.0303.
This retrospective study was designed to assess skeletal stability after the correction of mandibular prognathism by sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) and intraoral vertical subsigmoid osteotomy (VSO). We used lateral cephalographs of 31 patients taken before, immediately after, and at least one year after the operation. We recorded euclidean distance matrix analysis, linear and angular measurements, and x and y co-ordinates of cephalometric landmarks for each cephalograph. There were no significant differences in extent of the mandibular retrognathia or magnitude of change between the two groups. The main significant changes in both groups were reduction of the total mandibular length, and posterior shifting in the mandible. One year after the operation the main change was the mean forward relapse of 2.5 mm in the SSO group and the mean posterior relapse of 0.5 mm in the VSO group. The difference in skeletal stability between the groups was significant (P< 0.05), and we conclude that VSO is the more effective technique for correcting mandibular prognathism.
本回顾性研究旨在评估矢状劈开截骨术(SSO)和口内垂直乙状窦下截骨术(VSO)矫正下颌前突后骨骼的稳定性。我们使用了31例患者术前、术后即刻及术后至少一年的头颅侧位片。我们记录了每张头颅侧位片的欧几里得距离矩阵分析、线性和角度测量以及头影测量标志点的x和y坐标。两组之间下颌后缩的程度或变化幅度没有显著差异。两组的主要显著变化是下颌总长度缩短,以及下颌向后移位。术后一年,主要变化是SSO组平均向前复发2.5mm,VSO组平均向后复发0.5mm。两组之间骨骼稳定性的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),我们得出结论,VSO是矫正下颌前突更有效的技术。