Ladas S D, Malamou H, Giota G, Varzakakos I, Kitsanta P, Georgopoulos S, Spiliadi C, Raptis S A
2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Athens University, Evangelismos Hospital, Greece.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000 Jul;12(7):727-31. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200012070-00002.
Rapid, reliable in-office tests are needed for applying the adopted screen-and-treat strategy in Helicobacter pylori-positive young dyspeptic patients.
We have evaluated the performance characteristics of a whole-blood antibody (WBA) test for the detection of H. pylori infection under in-office conditions.
In a prospective double-blind study, 183 untreated patients referred to a tertiary centre for endoscopy because of dyspepsia were studied. Patients were defined as H. pylori-positive if two out of three tests (histology, rapid urease test, Gram staining of biopsy smears) were positive, and H. pylori-negative if all three tests were negative. An in-office test detecting IgG antibodies to H. pylori (FlexPack HP, Abbott Diagnostics) was used with capillary blood and compared with an ELISA detecting IgG (quantitative) and IgA (qualitative) H. pylori serum antibodies.
Of the 183 patients, 139 were defined as H. pylori-positive. The in-office test had 79% sensitivity, 95% specificity, 98% positive and 59% negative predictive value. The respective values for IgG serum antibodies were 94, 70, 91 and 79% and those for IgA antibodies were 86, 82, 94 and 64%. About 50% of the false-negative in-office tests had a serum IgG antibody titre > 100 units. Co-evaluation of our data with published reports suggested that both the median sensitivity and negative predictive value of the kit are significantly inferior when performed with whole-blood (five studies) compared with serum (nine studies) (82 versus 92% and 82 versus 93% respectively, P < 0.035).
Improvement of the performance characteristics of FlexPack HP in-office test is needed. However, the test may be a useful tool for identifying H. pylori-positive patients in younger age groups who could be managed without upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
在幽门螺杆菌阳性的年轻消化不良患者中应用所采用的筛查和治疗策略需要快速、可靠的门诊检测方法。
我们评估了一种全血抗体(WBA)检测在门诊条件下检测幽门螺杆菌感染的性能特征。
在一项前瞻性双盲研究中,对183名因消化不良被转诊至三级中心进行内镜检查的未治疗患者进行了研究。如果三项检测(组织学、快速尿素酶试验、活检涂片革兰氏染色)中有两项呈阳性,则患者被定义为幽门螺杆菌阳性;如果三项检测均为阴性,则为幽门螺杆菌阴性。使用一种检测幽门螺杆菌IgG抗体的门诊检测方法(FlexPack HP,雅培诊断)检测毛细血管血,并与一种检测IgG(定量)和IgA(定性)幽门螺杆菌血清抗体的酶联免疫吸附测定法进行比较。
183名患者中,139名被定义为幽门螺杆菌阳性。门诊检测的敏感性为79%,特异性为95%,阳性预测值为98%,阴性预测值为59%。IgG血清抗体的相应值分别为94%、70%、91%和79%,IgA抗体的相应值分别为86%、82%、94%和64%。约50%的门诊检测假阴性患者血清IgG抗体滴度>100单位。将我们的数据与已发表的报告进行共同评估表明,与血清检测(九项研究)相比,使用全血进行检测时(五项研究),该试剂盒的中位敏感性和阴性预测值均显著较低(分别为82%对92%和82%对93%,P<0.035)。
需要改进FlexPack HP门诊检测的性能特征。然而,该检测方法可能是识别年轻年龄组中幽门螺杆菌阳性患者的有用工具,这些患者无需进行上消化道内镜检查即可得到管理。