Archer John
U Central Lancashire.
Psychol Bull. 2000 Sep;126(5):651-680. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.651.
Meta-analyses of sex differences in physical aggression to heterosexual partners and in its physical consequences are reported. Women were slightly more likely (d = -.05) than men to use one or more act of physical aggression and to use such acts more frequently. Men were more likely (d = .15) to inflict an injury, and overall, 62% of those injured by a partner were women. The findings partially support previous claims that different methods of measurement produce conflicting results, but there was also evidence that the sample was an important moderator of effect size. Continuous models showed that younger aged dating samples and a lower proportion of physically aggressive males predicted effect sizes in the female direction. Analyses were limited by the available database, which is biased toward young dating samples in the United States. Wider variations are discussed in terms of two conflicting norms about physical aggression to partners that operate to different degrees in different cultures.
本文报告了对异性伴侣身体攻击行为及其身体后果中性别差异的荟萃分析。女性比男性更有可能(d = -0.05)实施一种或多种身体攻击行为,且使用此类行为的频率更高。男性更有可能(d = 0.15)造成伤害,总体而言,在伴侣造成伤害的人中,62%是女性。这些发现部分支持了先前的说法,即不同的测量方法会产生相互矛盾的结果,但也有证据表明样本是效应大小的重要调节因素。连续模型表明,年龄较小的约会样本以及身体攻击性男性比例较低,预示着效应大小朝着女性方向发展。分析受到现有数据库的限制,该数据库偏向于美国年轻的约会样本。本文从关于对伴侣身体攻击的两种相互冲突的规范角度讨论了更广泛的差异,这两种规范在不同文化中发挥着不同程度的作用。