Cooke M W, Wilson S, Bridge P
Emergency Medicine, Research Group, University of Warwick, Coventry.
J Accid Emerg Med. 2000 Sep;17(5):355-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.17.5.355.
Questionnaires are commonly sent to accident and emergency (A&E) departments to determine common practice and are often extrapolated to best practice.
To determine if questionnaire based studies have a defined population of A&E departments and whether studies are reproducible.
All questionnaires in the Journal of Accident and Emergency Medicine were reviewed and assessed for inclusion criteria, departments studied and study design.
30 questionnaires were detected, 22 were postal, six telephone and two did not state method of contact. Sample sizes ranged from 15 to 740 and inclusion of A&E departments was highly variable according to geographical area, size of department or consultant status. Seventeen (54.8%) did not state the source of A&E department listings. Response rates ranged from 55-100%. Only three studies undertook subset analysis according to either size or locality.
Questionnaire of studies A&E departments have poor methodology descriptions, which means that many are not reproducible. Inclusion criteria are highly variable and failure to analyse important subsets may mean that individual departments cannot apply recommendations. Questionnaire studies relating to A&E do not use a consistent well defined population of A&E departments. Information in the studies is usually inadequate to allow them to be repeated.
问卷通常被发送到急诊(A&E)科室以确定常规做法,并且常常被推断为最佳做法。
确定基于问卷的研究是否有明确界定的急诊科室群体,以及研究是否具有可重复性。
对《急诊医学杂志》中的所有问卷进行审查,并根据纳入标准、所研究的科室和研究设计进行评估。
共检测到30份问卷,22份通过邮寄,6份通过电话,2份未说明联系方式。样本量从15到740不等,急诊科室的纳入情况因地理区域、科室规模或顾问身份而有很大差异。17项研究(54.8%)未说明急诊科室列表的来源。回复率在55%至100%之间。只有三项研究根据规模或地点进行了子集分析。
关于急诊科室的问卷研究方法描述不佳,这意味着许多研究无法重复。纳入标准差异很大,未能分析重要子集可能意味着各个科室无法应用相关建议。与急诊相关的问卷研究并未使用一致且明确界定的急诊科室群体。研究中的信息通常不足以使其得以重复。