Suppr超能文献

氯吡格雷与冠状动脉支架置入术:下一个问题是什么?

Clopidogrel and coronary stenting: what is the next question?

作者信息

Moore S A, Steinhubl S R

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Wilford Hall Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas 78236, USA.

出版信息

J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2000 Oct;10(2):121-6. doi: 10.1023/a:1018706324908.

Abstract

Today, following coronary stenting, clopidogrel has largely replaced ticlopidine as part of combination antiplatelet therapy following coronary stenting primarily due to its better tolerability. While there is no randomized, blinded, efficacy trial of ticlopidine versus clopidogrel, there are ample data from a number of observational studies, randomized non-blinded trials, and a randomized blinded safety trial to prove that clopidogrel is not only safer than ticlopidine, but also at least as efficacious following stenting. With over 10,000 treated patients, pooled data suggest similar rates of stent thrombosis (clopidogrel 0.98% vs. ticlopidine 0.98%) and lower rates of major adverse cardiac events with clopidogrel (clopidogrel 1.63% vs. ticlopidine 4.52%, p<0.001), with a clear advantage for clopidogrel regarding adverse events (clopidogrel 5.91% vs. ticlopidine 9.75%, p<0.001). With clopidogrel's superior safety and at least equivalent efficacy, the question of "which thienopyridine?" post-stenting has been answered. Now the questions "how much?", "how soon?" and "how long?" must be addressed. The Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Events During Observation (CREDO) trial is a multi-center, double-blind, randomized trial designed to answer these remaining questions. CREDO will evaluate the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel pretreatment versus no pretreatment, and prolonged (1 year), versus short-term (1 month) dual antiplatelet therapy in 2,000 patients undergoing planned or highly probable coronary intervention with a stent.

摘要

如今,在冠状动脉支架置入术后,氯吡格雷已在很大程度上取代噻氯匹定,成为联合抗血小板治疗的一部分,这主要是因为其耐受性更好。虽然尚无关于噻氯匹定与氯吡格雷的随机、双盲疗效试验,但有大量来自多项观察性研究、随机非盲试验以及一项随机双盲安全性试验的数据证明,氯吡格雷不仅比噻氯匹定更安全,而且在支架置入术后至少具有同等疗效。汇总超过10000例接受治疗患者的数据显示,支架血栓形成发生率相似(氯吡格雷为0.98%,噻氯匹定为0.98%),而氯吡格雷组的主要不良心脏事件发生率更低(氯吡格雷为1.63%,噻氯匹定为4.52%,p<0.001),在不良事件方面氯吡格雷具有明显优势(氯吡格雷为5.91%,噻氯匹定为9.75%,p<0.001)。鉴于氯吡格雷具有更高的安全性和至少同等的疗效,“支架置入术后使用哪种噻吩并吡啶类药物?”这一问题已有答案。现在必须解决“用多少?”“多快开始用?”以及“用多久?”这些问题。氯吡格雷用于减少观察期事件(CREDO)试验是一项多中心、双盲、随机试验,旨在回答这些剩余问题。CREDO试验将在2000例计划接受或极有可能接受冠状动脉支架介入治疗的患者中,评估氯吡格雷预处理与不预处理、长期(1年)与短期(1个月)双重抗血小板治疗的疗效和安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验