Sai Sudhakar C B, Elefteriades J A
Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510, USA.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Sep;70(3):856-8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01498-3.
The surgical approach to the aortic arch via median sternotomy can be hindered by the left innominate vein (LIV). Retraction of the LIV may injure the vein. The safety of LIV ligation has been controversial. Opinion has also differed regarding whether a divided vein should be reanastomosed after arch replacement is completed. We report our experience with division and ligation of the LIV for improved aortic arch exposure and facilitated excision of mediastinal tumors.
From January 1996 to June 1998, the LIV was divided and ligated in 14 patients (8 men, 4 women) after consideration of local anatomy, adequacy of aortic arch exposure, level of distal aortic anastomosis, and in case of mediastinal tumors, extent of involvement of mediastinal structures. The LIV was divided between clamps, doubly ligated, and the ends oversewn. Patients were assessed at 1 month and at yearly intervals for upper extremity edema and neurologic symptoms.
In 12 patients LIV division improved aortic arch access, and in 2 patients, it facilitated excision of mediastinal tumors. The mean age of patients was 56 years (range 22 to 80). Follow-up ranged from 1 week to 30 months. All patients had left upper extremity edema for 7 to 10 days, which resolved with arm elevation. One early patient required reexploration for bleeding from the LIV stump. One patient died because of multiorgan dysfunction. None had any residual left upper extremity edema or neurologic symptoms.
We conclude that, although not uniformly or commonly necessary, division of the LIV can safely be utilized to facilitate aortic arch exposure without significant long-term morbidity. LIV reanastomosis is not necessary.
经正中胸骨切开术处理主动脉弓时,左无名静脉(LIV)可能会妨碍手术操作。牵拉左无名静脉可能会损伤该静脉。左无名静脉结扎的安全性一直存在争议。对于在主动脉弓置换完成后是否应重新吻合切断的静脉,观点也不尽相同。我们报告了我们对左无名静脉进行切断和结扎以改善主动脉弓暴露并便于切除纵隔肿瘤的经验。
1996年1月至1998年6月,在考虑局部解剖结构、主动脉弓暴露的充分性、远端主动脉吻合的水平以及纵隔肿瘤的情况下,纵隔结构的受累程度,对14例患者(8例男性,4例女性)进行了左无名静脉的切断和结扎。左无名静脉在夹子之间切断,双重结扎,两端缝合。在1个月时以及每年对患者进行评估,观察上肢水肿和神经症状。
12例患者中,左无名静脉切断改善了主动脉弓的显露,2例患者中,它便于纵隔肿瘤的切除。患者的平均年龄为56岁(范围22至80岁)。随访时间为1周至30个月。所有患者左上肢均出现水肿7至10天,抬高上肢后水肿消退。1例早期患者因左无名静脉残端出血需要再次手术探查。1例患者因多器官功能障碍死亡。无一例有任何残留的左上肢水肿或神经症状。
我们得出结论,尽管并非一律或普遍必要,但左无名静脉切断可安全地用于促进主动脉弓暴露,而不会有明显的长期发病率。无需重新吻合左无名静脉。