Mehta A, Jain A C, Mehta M C, Billie M
Department of Medicine, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center, Morgantown 26506-9157, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2000 Feb 1;85(3):354-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00746-8.
The objective of this study was to identify left atrial (LA) abnormality on the electrocardiogram and other related variables as predictors of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy in the presence of left bundle branch block (LBBB). In the presence of complete LBBB, the diagnosis of electrocardiographic abnormalities is problematic and that of LV hypertrophy remains difficult. The usual electrocardiographic criteria applied for the diagnosis of LV hypertrophy may not be reliable in the presence of LBBB. Therefore, noninvasive criteria will help physicians diagnose LV hypertrophy with electrocardiography. LA abnormality on the electrocardiogram was assessed by 2 independent observers as predictor of LV hypertrophy in the presence of LBBB in 120 patients, and data were compared with those of 100 patients without LA abnormality. LV mass was calculated from echocardiographic data. Besides LA abnormality, the other variables studied for prediction of LV hypertrophy were gender, age, body surface area, body mass index, frontal axis, and QrS duration. Of the 6 criteria analyzed, the P terminal force was found to be the most common and consistent criterion to detect LA abnormality. LV hypertrophy was confirmed by echocardiographic determination of LV mass in both groups. Observers reliably differentiated between the hypertrophied and normal-sized left ventricle in the presence of LBBB by correlating LA abnormality with LV mass determined by echocardiography. Observer 1 detected LA abnormality in 89% and observer 2 in 84% of patients. False-positive results were present in 11% and 16%. The observer's recognition of LA abnormality in the present study was 91%. The 2 observers showed a sensitivity of 81% and 79% and a specificity of 91% and 88%, respectively, when diagnosis of LV hypertrophy was determined. LV mass increased significantly and was diagnostic of LV hypertrophy in 92% of patients with LA abnormality. In the remaining 11 patients (8%), the LA abnormality was of marginal abnormal magnitude. Each 0.01-mV/s increase in LA abnormality gave an increase of 30 g of LV mass. LV mass was increased in 86% of patients when corrected by body surface area. LV hypertrophy in the presence of LBBB on electrocardiography was found in only 13 patients (10%) when the 6 frequently used conventional criteria for diagnosis of LV hypertrophy by electrocardiography were used. Regression analysis revealed LA abnormality to be a strong independent predictor of increased LV mass. Multivariate analysis also revealed age, body mass index, body surface area, frontal axis, and QrS duration to be significant predictors of LV mass. This noninvasive study correlates LA abnormality by electrocardiogram and LV hypertrophy with echocardiography to conclude that LA abnormality was significantly diagnostic of LV hypertrophy in the presence of LBBB. Age, body mass index, body surface area, frontal axis, and QrS duration were also significant predictors of LV mass.
本研究的目的是确定心电图上的左心房(LA)异常及其他相关变量,作为存在左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)时左心室(LV)肥厚的预测指标。在完全性LBBB存在的情况下,心电图异常的诊断存在问题,LV肥厚的诊断仍然困难。用于诊断LV肥厚的常规心电图标准在存在LBBB时可能不可靠。因此,非侵入性标准将有助于医生通过心电图诊断LV肥厚。两名独立观察者评估心电图上的LA异常,作为120例存在LBBB患者LV肥厚的预测指标,并将数据与100例无LA异常患者的数据进行比较。根据超声心动图数据计算LV质量。除LA异常外,研究的用于预测LV肥厚的其他变量包括性别、年龄、体表面积、体重指数、额面电轴和QRS时限。在分析的6项标准中,P波终末电势被发现是检测LA异常最常见且一致的标准。两组均通过超声心动图测定LV质量来确诊LV肥厚。观察者通过将LA异常与超声心动图测定的LV质量相关联,在存在LBBB的情况下可靠地区分肥厚和正常大小的左心室。观察者1在89%的患者中检测到LA异常,观察者2在84%的患者中检测到。假阳性结果分别为11%和16%。本研究中观察者对LA异常的识别率为91%。在确定LV肥厚的诊断时,两名观察者的敏感性分别为81%和79%,特异性分别为91%和88%。LA异常患者中92%的LV质量显著增加且可诊断为LV肥厚。在其余11例患者(8%)中,LA异常程度为临界异常。LA异常每增加0.01mV/s,LV质量增加30g。经体表面积校正后,86%的患者LV质量增加。当使用心电图诊断LV肥厚的6项常用传统标准时,心电图显示存在LBBB的患者中仅13例(10%)有LV肥厚。回归分析显示LA异常是LV质量增加的强有力独立预测指标。多变量分析还显示年龄、体重指数、体表面积、额面电轴和QRS时限是LV质量的重要预测指标。这项非侵入性研究将心电图上的LA异常与超声心动图显示的LV肥厚相关联,得出结论:在存在LBBB的情况下,LA异常对LV肥厚具有显著诊断意义。年龄、体重指数、体表面积、额面电轴和QRS时限也是LV质量的重要预测指标。