Horwich A, Oliver R T, Wilkinson P M, Mead G M, Harland S J, Cullen M H, Roberts J T, Fossa S D, Dearnaley D P, Lallemand E, Stenning S P
Radiotherapy Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
Br J Cancer. 2000 Dec;83(12):1623-9. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1498.
The UK Medical Research Council conducted this trial of carboplatin chemotherapy in advanced seminoma to compare single agent carboplatin with a standard combination of etoposide with cisplatin. The use of single agent carboplatin was expected to be associated with reduced toxicity. A total of 130 patients with advanced seminoma were randomly assigned to treatment with either single agent carboplatin (C) at a dose of 400 mg/m(2)to be corrected for glomerular filtration rate outside the range 81-120 ml min(-1)and to be administered on day 1 of a 21 day cycle to a total of 4 cycles or to etoposide + platinum (EP). The trial was designed as an equivalence study aiming to exclude a reduction in the 3-year progression-free survival in patients allocated to carboplatin of between 10 and 15%, requiring initially a target accrual of 250 patients (90% power significance level 5% (one-sided)). The trial closed after 130 patients had been randomized following recommendation by an independent data monitoring committee. At a median follow-up time of 4.5 years, 81% of patients had been followed up for at least 3 years and 19 patients have died. The estimated PFS rate (95% Confidence Intervals (CI)) at 3 years was 71% (60-82%) in patients allocated C and 81% (71-90%) in those allocated EP; the 95% CI for the difference in 3 year PFS was - 6% to +19%. The hazard ratio of 0.64 (95% CI 0.32-1.28) favoured EP but the difference was not statistically significant (log rank chi-squared = 1.59 P = 0.21). The 3-year survival rate was 84% (75-92%) in those allocated C, and 89% (81-96%) in those allocated EP. The hazard ratio for survival was 0.85 with 95% CI, 0.35-2.10, log rank chi-squared = 0.12, P = 0.73. The trial has not demonstrated statistically significant differences in the major survival endpoints comparing single agent carboplatin with a combination of etoposide + cisplatin. This cannot be taken as an indication of equivalence since the limited size of this trial rendered it unable to exclude a 19% lower progression-free survival and survival in those treated with single agent carboplatin which would be important clinically. Standard initial chemotherapy for advanced seminoma should be based on cisplatin combinations and the role of carboplatin awaits the outcome of further studies.
英国医学研究理事会开展了这项关于晚期精原细胞瘤卡铂化疗的试验,以比较单药卡铂与依托泊苷和顺铂的标准联合用药。预计使用单药卡铂会降低毒性。共有130例晚期精原细胞瘤患者被随机分配接受以下治疗:单药卡铂(C),剂量为400mg/m²,根据肾小球滤过率校正,当肾小球滤过率不在81 - 120ml/min范围内时进行校正,并在21天周期的第1天给药,共4个周期;或接受依托泊苷 + 铂类(EP)治疗。该试验设计为一项等效性研究,旨在排除分配至卡铂组的患者3年无进展生存率降低10%至15%的情况,最初需要纳入250例患者(检验效能90%,显著性水平5%(单侧))。在独立数据监测委员会建议后,130例患者随机分组后试验结束。中位随访时间为4.5年,81%的患者随访至少3年,19例患者死亡。分配至C组的患者3年无进展生存率估计值(95%置信区间(CI))为71%(60 - 82%),分配至EP组的患者为81%(71 - 90%);3年无进展生存率差异的95%CI为 - 6%至 +19%。风险比为0.64(95%CI 0.32 - 1.28),倾向于EP组,但差异无统计学意义(对数秩卡方 = 1.59,P = 0.21)。分配至C组的患者3年生存率为84%(75 - 92%),分配至EP组的患者为89%(81 - 96%)。生存风险比为0.85,95%CI为0.35 - 2.10,对数秩卡方 = 0.12,P = 0.73。该试验未显示在主要生存终点方面,单药卡铂与依托泊苷 + 顺铂联合用药之间存在统计学显著差异。但这不能被视为等效性的指标,因为该试验规模有限,无法排除单药卡铂治疗组患者的无进展生存率和生存率低19%的情况,而这在临床上可能很重要。晚期精原细胞瘤的标准初始化疗应基于顺铂联合用药,卡铂的作用有待进一步研究的结果。