Wood K V, Hachey D L
Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA.
J Mass Spectrom. 2000 Oct;35(10):1157-64. doi: 10.1002/1096-9888(200010)35:10<1157::AID-JMS68>3.0.CO;2-E.
The rapid evolution of mass spectrometry in the past 15 years has moved mass spectrometry facilities from the traditional model in which instruments were located in and used for a single department's samples to a distributed model servicing entire universities. In this paper we describe two such shared instrument facilities that have evolved from a base in a single department to facilities that service a broad clientele. The Purdue University Campus-wide Mass Spectrometry Center (CWMSC) is a decentralized facility with multiple sites on campus. The CWMSC is a limited-access facility in which samples are run by service facility personnel in close cooperation with investigators. The Vanderbilt University Mass Spectrometry Research Center (VU-MSRC) is a centralized facility in the medical school that provides services to the university at large. The VU-MSRC is an open-access facility in which users are expected to prepare and analyze their own samples under the guidance of a trained operator. Perhaps the most significant benefit achieved by these models has been the minimization of academic barriers and the resultant intellectual cross-fertilization that has greatly enriched research at institutions where this approach has been adopted. The advantages and limitations of both models are discussed in terms of the traditional academic paradigm of service, research and education.
在过去15年里,质谱技术迅速发展,使得质谱设施从传统模式(仪器位于单个部门并仅用于该部门的样品)转变为服务于整个大学的分布式模式。在本文中,我们描述了两个这样的共享仪器设施,它们从单个部门的基础发展成为服务广泛客户群体的设施。普渡大学校园质谱中心(CWMSC)是一个分散式设施,在校园内有多个站点。CWMSC是一个限制访问的设施,样品由服务设施人员与研究人员密切合作进行检测。范德堡大学质谱研究中心(VU-MSRC)是医学院的一个集中式设施,为整个大学提供服务。VU-MSRC是一个开放访问的设施,用户有望在经过培训的操作人员的指导下自行制备和分析样品。这些模式带来的最显著好处可能是学术障碍的最小化以及由此产生的知识交叉融合,这极大地丰富了采用这种方法的机构的研究。我们从服务、研究和教育的传统学术范式角度讨论了这两种模式的优缺点。