Spinler S A, Al-Jazairi A S, Cheng J W, Kapoor S, Kobrin S, Shaw L
Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacy Administration, Philadelphia College of Pharmacy, University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ther Drug Monit. 2000 Dec;22(6):729-36. doi: 10.1097/00007691-200012000-00013.
This prospective study was conducted to compare the predictive performance of fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA, Abbott TDx Digoxin II) and radioimmunoassay (RIA, Kallestad Labs) with combined low-pressure liquid chromatography/RIA (LPLC/RIA) digoxin assay in measuring 15-17 serum digoxin concentrations (SDC) obtained after a single 10 microg/kg intravenous digoxin dose in patients with various degrees of renal function and at different SDC ranges. Eighteen men and women were stratified into 3 age- and gender-matched groups based upon renal function [N = 6 in each, group I (Cl(cr) < 10 mL/min), group II (Cl(cr) = 10-50 mL/min), and group III (Cl(cr) > 50 mL/min)]. Serum digoxin concentrations were measured at time zero; at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours; and at 2, 3, 4, and 5-7 days after the digoxin dose, using the three different digoxin assays. TDx Digoxin II was unbiased [mean error -0.09 (95% CI -0.19, 0.01)] and RIA biased [mean error -0.29 (95% CI -0.36, -0.21)] to over-predict SDC by 14.2%. In group I patients, the analysis revealed a bias to over-predict SDC by 6.0% for TDx Digoxin II [mean error -0.16 (95% CI -0.29, -0.07)] and an unbiased performance by RIA. In groups II and III, both TDx Digoxin II and RIA showed biased performance, the mean magnitude of bias was low (< 20%). For intermediate SDC range (> 0.5 ng/mL and < or = 3.0 ng/mL), TDx Digoxin II was unbiased in predicting SDC, whereas RIA was biased to under-predict SDC [mean error 0.13 (95% CI 0.10, 0.16)] by 9.9%. The magnitude of bias observed in all cases was less than 20%. Both assays, TDx Digoxin II and RIA, imprecisely measured SDC for all samples combined, different groups and SDC ranges. In all time-paired samples, TDx Digoxin II (FPIA) performed better than the RIA. In conclusion, the magnitude of bias observed with either assay at different groups and SDC ranges was not likely to be clinically relevant. Therefore, either assay may be used to measure SDC in clinical practice.
本前瞻性研究旨在比较荧光偏振免疫分析法(FPIA,雅培TDx地高辛II)、放射免疫分析法(RIA,卡莱斯塔德实验室)与低压液相色谱/放射免疫联合分析法(LPLC/RIA)地高辛测定法在测量不同程度肾功能患者单次静脉注射10μg/kg地高辛剂量后获得的15 - 17个血清地高辛浓度(SDC)时的预测性能,以及在不同SDC范围内的表现。18名男性和女性根据肾功能被分层为3个年龄和性别匹配的组[每组N = 6,I组(肌酐清除率Cl(cr) < 10 mL/min),II组(Cl(cr) = 10 - 50 mL/min),III组(Cl(cr) > 50 mL/min)]。在注射地高辛后的0时刻、0.25、0.5、0.75、1、2、3、4、6、8和12小时,以及2、3、4和5 - 7天,使用三种不同的地高辛测定法测量血清地高辛浓度。TDx地高辛II无偏差[平均误差 - 0.09(95%可信区间 - 0.19,0.01)],而RIA有偏差[平均误差 - 0.29(95%可信区间 - 0.36, - 0.21)],高估SDC达14.2%。在I组患者中,分析显示TDx地高辛II高估SDC 6.0%[平均误差 - 0.16(95%可信区间 - 0.29, - 0.07)],而RIA表现无偏差。在II组和III组中,TDx地高辛II和RIA均表现出有偏差的性能,偏差的平均幅度较低(< 20%)。对于中等SDC范围(> 0.5 ng/mL且≤ 3.0 ng/mL),TDx地高辛II在预测SDC时无偏差,而RIA有偏差,低估SDC[平均误差0.13(95%可信区间0.10,0.16)]达9.9%。在所有情况下观察到的偏差幅度均小于20%。TDx地高辛II和RIA这两种测定法对所有合并样本、不同组以及SDC范围的SDC测量均不精确。在所有时间配对样本中,TDx地高辛II(FPIA)的表现优于RIA。总之,在不同组和SDC范围内,两种测定法观察到的偏差幅度在临床上可能无关紧要。因此,在临床实践中两种测定法均可用于测量SDC。