Heesy C P, Ross C F
Interdepartmental Doctoral Program in Anthropological Sciences, Department of Anatomical Sciences, Health Sciences Center, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794-8081, USA.
J Hum Evol. 2001 Feb;40(2):111-49. doi: 10.1006/jhev.2000.0447.
Hypotheses for the adaptive origin of primates have reconstructed nocturnality as the primitive activity pattern for the entire order based on functional/adaptive interpretations of the relative size and orientation of the orbits, body size and dietary reconstruction. Based on comparative data from extant taxa this reconstruction implies that basal primates were also solitary, faunivorous, and arboreal. Recently, primates have been hypothesized to be primitively diurnal, based in part on the distribution of color-sensitive photoreceptor opsin genes and active trichromatic color vision in several extant strepsirrhines, as well as anthropoid primates (Tan & Li, 1999 Nature402, 36; Li, 2000 Am. J. phys. Anthrop. Supple.30, 318). If diurnality is primitive for all primates then the functional and adaptive significance of aspects of strepsirrhine retinal morphology and other adaptations of the primate visual system such as high acuity stereopsis, have been misinterpreted for decades. This hypothesis also implies that nocturnality evolved numerous times in primates. However, the hypothesis that primates are primitively diurnal has not been analyzed in a phylogenetic context, nor have the activity patterns of several fossil primates been considered. This study investigated the evolution of activity patterns and trichromacy in primates using a new method for reconstructing activity patterns in fragmentary fossils and by reconstructing visual system character evolution at key ancestral nodes of primate higher taxa. Results support previous studies that reconstruct omomyiform primates as nocturnal. The larger body sizes of adapiform primates confound inferences regarding activity pattern evolution in this group. The hypothesis of diurnality and trichromacy as primitive for primates is not supported by the phylogenetic data. On the contrary, nocturnality and dichromatic vision are not only primitive for all primates, but also for extant strepsirrhines. Diurnality, and possibly X-linked polymorphic trichromacy, evolved at least in the stem lineage of Anthropoidea, or the stem lineage of all haplorhines.
关于灵长类动物适应性起源的假说,基于对眼眶的相对大小和方向、体型以及饮食结构的功能/适应性解读,将夜行性重构为整个灵长目动物的原始活动模式。基于现存分类群的比较数据,这种重构意味着基础灵长类动物也是独居、食虫且树栖的。最近,有人提出灵长类动物最初是昼行性的,部分依据是几种现存狐猴以及类人猿灵长类动物中颜色敏感光感受器视蛋白基因的分布和活跃的三色视觉(Tan & Li,1999年,《自然》402卷,36页;Li,2000年,《美国体质人类学杂志增刊》30卷,318页)。如果昼行性是所有灵长类动物的原始特征,那么狐猴视网膜形态的各个方面以及灵长类视觉系统的其他适应性特征(如高敏锐度立体视觉)的功能和适应性意义就被误解了几十年。这个假说还意味着夜行性在灵长类动物中多次演化。然而,灵长类动物最初是昼行性的这一假说尚未在系统发育背景下进行分析,也没有考虑几种化石灵长类动物的活动模式。本研究使用一种新方法来重构破碎化石中的活动模式,并通过重构灵长类高级分类单元关键祖先节点处的视觉系统特征演化,来研究灵长类动物活动模式和三色视觉的演化。结果支持了之前将始镜猴形灵长类动物重构为夜行性的研究。兔猴形灵长类动物较大的体型使关于该类群活动模式演化的推断变得复杂。系统发育数据不支持灵长类动物最初是昼行性和具有三色视觉的假说。相反,夜行性和双色视觉不仅是所有灵长类动物的原始特征,也是现存狐猴的原始特征。昼行性,以及可能的X连锁多态三色视觉,至少在类人猿的主干谱系或所有简鼻亚目的主干谱系中演化而来。