Page G G, Blakely W P, Ben-Eliyahu S
School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, 525 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Pain. 2001 Feb 1;90(1-2):191-9. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00403-6.
We have previously shown in rats that the provision of analgesic doses of morphine significantly reduces the tumor-promoting effects of undergoing and recovering from surgery. Because morphine had no effect in non-operated animals, and because a single preoperative dose given hours before tumor inoculation was effective, we have suggested that it is the pain-relieving effects of the drug that underlies its beneficial impact. To support and strengthen this suggestion, two different regimens of analgesia were employed, the systemic administration of the more selective mu-agonist, fentanyl, and the intrathecal (i.t.) administration of bupivacaine plus morphine. To assess host resistance against metastasis, we used a lung clearance assay of the MADB106 mammary adenocarcinoma, a natural killer (NK)-sensitive syngeneic cell line that metastasizes only to the lungs. Female and male Fischer 344 rats were randomly assigned to one of four groups using a 2x2 experimental design: experimental laparotomy under halothane anesthesia versus anesthesia alone, by drug treatment versus vehicle. In the first in vivo experiment, fentanyl was administered 20 min before surgery (40 microg/kg subcutaneously (s.c.)), and at the end of surgery in a slow-release suspension (20 microg/kg s.c.). In the second in vivo experiment, bupivacaine (10 microg) plus morphine (20 microg) in 50 microl was administered i.t. before surgery. Surgery resulted in a 3- to 4-fold increase in the lung retention of MADB106 cells in both males and females, and the observed surgery-induced increase in lung tumor retention was reduced by more than 65% in the fentanyl-treated animals and more than 45% in the animals receiving i.t. bupivacaine plus morphine. Neither drug regimen exerted effects in the anesthesia only animals. Surgery also resulted in a significant suppression of whole blood NK activity assessed at 5 h postoperatively, the same time point at which MADB106 tumor cells were inoculated in the in vivo studies. Unlike the in vivo study, fentanyl suppressed NK activity at this time point in non-operated rats, but had no effect in operated rats. Taken together, these findings strengthen the suggestion that the management of perioperative pain is a critical factor in preventing surgery-induced decreases in host resistance against metastasis. If similar relationships between pain and metastasis occur in humans, then pain control must become a priority in the postoperative care of individuals with cancer.
我们之前在大鼠实验中发现,给予镇痛剂量的吗啡可显著降低手术及术后恢复过程中的肿瘤促进作用。由于吗啡对未手术动物无影响,且在肿瘤接种前数小时给予单次术前剂量即有效果,我们推测该药物的止痛作用是其产生有益影响的基础。为支持并强化这一推测,我们采用了两种不同的镇痛方案,即全身给予选择性更高的μ受体激动剂芬太尼,以及鞘内注射布比卡因加吗啡。为评估宿主对转移的抵抗力,我们使用了MADB106乳腺腺癌的肺清除试验,MADB106是一种仅转移至肺部的对自然杀伤(NK)细胞敏感的同基因细胞系。采用2×2实验设计,将雄性和雌性Fischer 344大鼠随机分为四组:接受氟烷麻醉下的实验性剖腹手术组与仅接受麻醉组,药物治疗组与溶剂对照组。在首个体内实验中,术前20分钟给予芬太尼(40微克/千克皮下注射),手术结束时给予缓释混悬液(20微克/千克皮下注射)。在第二个体内实验中,术前鞘内注射50微升含布比卡因(10微克)加吗啡(20微克)的溶液。手术导致雄性和雌性大鼠肺部MADB106细胞滞留量增加3至4倍,而在芬太尼治疗组动物中,观察到的手术诱导的肺部肿瘤滞留增加减少了65%以上,在接受鞘内注射布比卡因加吗啡的动物中减少了45%以上。两种药物方案对仅接受麻醉的动物均无作用。手术还导致术后5小时评估的全血NK活性显著受抑,这也是体内研究中接种MADB106肿瘤细胞的时间点。与体内研究不同,芬太尼在该时间点对未手术大鼠的NK活性有抑制作用,但对手术大鼠无影响。综上所述,这些发现强化了以下推测:围手术期疼痛的管理是预防手术诱导的宿主对转移抵抗力下降的关键因素。如果人类中疼痛与转移之间存在类似关系,那么疼痛控制必须成为癌症患者术后护理的优先事项。