Investigating allegations of research misconduct. Nurses undertaking the CNEP trial give their support and describe their experiences.
作者信息
Wright T, Luckuing K
出版信息
BMJ. 2000 Nov 25;321(7272):1346; author reply 1348-9.
PMID:11186440
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Investigating allegations of research misconduct. Nurses undertaking the CNEP trial give their support and describe their experiences.
BMJ. 2000 Nov 25;321(7272):1346; author reply 1348-9.
2
Investigating allegations of research misconduct. CNEP trial was greatly flawed.
BMJ. 2000 Nov 25;321(7272):1345-6; author reply 1348-9.
3
Investigating allegations of research misconduct. British association of perinatal medicine welcomes analysis of Griffiths report.
BMJ. 2000 Nov 25;321(7272):1346; author reply 1348-9.
4
Investigating allegations of research misconduct. Response to concerns raised by Mr. and Mrs. Henshall.
BMJ. 2000 Nov 25;321(7272):1348-9.
5
The 1996 Continuous Negative Extrathoracic Pressure (CNEP) trial: were parents' allegations of research fraud fraudulent?
Pediatrics. 2006 Jun;117(6):2244-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0819.
6
Investigating allegations of research misconduct. Some questions still need answers.
BMJ. 2000 Nov 25;321(7272):1347; author reply 1348-9.
7
Investigating allegations of research misconduct: the vital need for due process.
BMJ. 2000 Sep 23;321(7263):752-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7263.752.
8
The Stoke CNEP saga--a view from the General Medical Council.
J R Soc Med. 2010 Aug 1;103(8):313-6. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.09k076. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
9
The effect of the neonatal Continuous Negative Extrathoracic Pressure (CNEP) trial enquiries on research in the UK.
Arch Dis Child. 2011 Jun;96(6):500-4. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.188243. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
10
CNEP needs to return.
Lancet. 2006 Apr 1;367(9516):1033-1035. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68446-8.
引用本文的文献
1
The Stoke CNEP Saga - how it damaged all involved.
J R Soc Med. 2010 Jul;103(7):277-82. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2010.10k012. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
Zotero 插件