McLellan T M, Cheung S S
Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine, Environmental and Applied Ergonomics Section, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ergonomics. 2000 Dec;43(12):2020-30. doi: 10.1080/00140130050201454.
This study used partitional calorimetry to determine the influence of fluid replacement on heat storage during uncompensable heat stress. Eight males performed either light (L; level treadmill walking at 0.97 m x s(-1) (3.5 km x h(-1)) or heavy (H; 1.33 m x s(-1) (4.8 km x h(-1)) at a 4% grade) exercise at 40 degrees C and 30% relative humidity while wearing nuclear, biological and chemical (NBC) protective clothing. Subjects received either no fluid (NF), or 200 or 250 ml of fluid (F) as warm water at approximately 35 degrees C immediately before and every 15 min during the L and H trials respectively. Similar reductions in heart rate were observed at both metabolic rates with F but rectal temperature responses were not different between F and NF. Tolerance time was extended during L/F (106.5 +/- 22.1 min) compared with L/NF (93.1 +/- 20.8 min) but fluid replacement had no influence during H (59.8 +/- 9.5 min and 58.3 +/- 11.1 min for F and NF respectively). Fluid replacement also had no effect on the rate of heat storage during L (108.2 +/- 20.6 W x m(-2) and 111.0 +/- 22.6 W x m(-2) for F and NF respectively) and H (172.5 +/- 11.5 W x m(-2) and 182.1 +/- 15.8 W x m(-2) for F and NF respectively). However, heat storage expressed per unit of mass was significantly increased during L/F (18.5 +/- 4.0 kJ x kg(-1) ) compared with the other trials (16.3 +/- 4.8 kJ x kg(-1), 16.6 +/- 3.0 kJ x kg(-1) and 16.7 +/- 4.0 kJ x kg(-1) for L/NF, H/F and H/NF respectively). It was concluded that fluid replacement does not alter the rate of heat storage during uncompensable heat stress but does increase the heat storage capacity during light exercise when tolerance times are > 60 min.
本研究采用分区量热法来确定在不可补偿热应激期间补液对热量储存的影响。八名男性在40摄氏度、相对湿度30%的环境中,穿着核生化(NBC)防护服进行轻度(L;在0.97米/秒(3.5千米/小时)的水平跑步机上行走)或重度(H;在4%坡度下以1.33米/秒(4.8千米/小时)的速度行走)运动。在L和H试验期间,受试者分别在运动前及运动过程中每隔15分钟接受无补液(NF),或200或250毫升约35摄氏度的温水补液(F)。在两种代谢率下,接受F补液的受试者心率均有类似程度的降低,但F组和NF组的直肠温度反应无差异。与L/NF组(93.1±20.8分钟)相比,L/F组(106.5±22.1分钟)的耐受时间延长,但在H组中补液无影响(F组和NF组分别为59.8±9.5分钟和58.3±11.1分钟)。补液对L组(F组和NF组分别为108.2±20.6瓦/平方米和111.0±22.6瓦/平方米)和H组(F组和NF组分别为172.5±11.5瓦/平方米和182.1±15.8瓦/平方米)的热量储存速率也无影响。然而,与其他试验相比,L/F组每单位质量的热量储存显著增加(18.5±4.0千焦/千克)(L/NF组、H/F组和H/NF组分别为16.3±4.8千焦/千克、16.6±3.0千焦/千克和16.7±4.0千焦/千克)。研究得出结论,在不可补偿热应激期间,补液不会改变热量储存速率,但在耐受时间>60分钟的轻度运动期间会增加热量储存能力。