Suppr超能文献

Clinical results and development of variable-stiffness video colonoscopes.

作者信息

Odori T, Goto H, Arisawa T, Niwa Y, Ohmiya N, Hayakawa T

机构信息

Second Dept. of Internal Medicine, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya City, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2001 Jan;33(1):65-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-11174.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

This study was designed to assess the usefulness of variable-stiffness video colonoscopes, compared with conventional videoscopes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The first prototype XCF-QAY1 and the latter prototype XCF-Q240A1 used in this study can be varied to 4 levels of stiffness of tube insertion during examination. In 352 consecutive colonoscopic examinations performed using these and two conventional scopes, the following data were recorded: time for intubation to the cecum, frequency of changes in the patients' posture, frequency of abdominal pressure attempts, and pain score. The degree of stiffness of the insertion tube and the examiners' impressions score were recorded only in procedures where the variable-stiffness scopes were used.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between colonoscopes in the pain score. Total colonoscopy rate was 97.4%. The frequency of usage of the varying stiffness control in the colon according to site was as follows: descending colon, 57.3%; transverse colon, 32.8%, sigmoid colon, 7.6%; and ascending colon, 2.3%. A significant difference in the mean time for intubation to the cecum between the XCF-Q240A1 and conventional scopes was observed. Moreover, there were significant differences in the frequency of abdominal pressure attempts and changes in the patient's posture between conventional scopes and the new scopes.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that only one scope, the XCF-Q240A1, is needed for any colonic examination by any examiner.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验