Seiffge-Krenke I
Psychologisches Institut, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Staudingerweg 9, 55099 Mainz.
Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 2001 Jan;50(1):1-15.
Based on semistructured interviews and the analyses of diary entries, frequency and function of imaginary companions, compared to real friendships, were investigated in an adolescent sample. Results suggest that while imaginary companions fulfill a number of different functions for the identity development, which supplement experiences with close friends, they do not compensate for the lack of close friendships. Real and fantasized comparisons with a highly similar significant other are most important. Interestingly, as an adult, writers hardly remember these positive functions for their own developmental progression.
基于半结构化访谈和日记条目的分析,在一个青少年样本中,对假想同伴的频率和功能与真实友谊进行了比较研究。结果表明,虽然假想同伴在身份发展方面发挥了许多不同的功能,对与亲密朋友的经历起到了补充作用,但它们并不能弥补亲密友谊的缺失。与高度相似的重要他人进行真实和幻想的比较最为重要。有趣的是,作为成年人,作家们几乎不记得这些对他们自身发展进程的积极作用。