Braddick O J, O'Brien J M, Wattam-Bell J, Atkinson J, Hartley T, Turner R
Department of Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Perception. 2001;30(1):61-72. doi: 10.1068/p3048.
Detection of coherent motion versus noise is widely used as a measure of global visual-motion processing. To localise the human brain mechanisms involved in this performance, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to compare brain activation during viewing of coherently moving random dots with that during viewing spatially and temporally comparable dynamic noise. Rates of reversal of coherent motion and coherent-motion velocities (5 versus 20 deg s-1) were also compared. Differences in local activation between conditions were analysed by statistical parametric mapping. Greater activation by coherent motion compared to noise was found in V5 and putative V3A, but not in V1. In addition there were foci of activation on the occipital ventral surface, the intraparietal sulcus, and superior temporal sulcus. Thus, coherent-motion information has distinctive effects in a number of extrastriate visual brain areas. The rate of motion reversal showed only weak effects in motion-sensitive areas. V1 was better activated by noise than by coherent motion, possibly reflecting activation of neurons with a wider range of motion selectivities. This activation was at a more anterior location in the comparison of noise with the faster velocity, suggesting that 20 deg s-1 is beyond the velocity range of the V1 representation of central visual field. These results support the use of motion-coherence tests for extrastriate as opposed to V1 function. However, sensitivity to motion coherence is not confined to V5, and may extend beyond the classically defined dorsal stream.
检测连贯运动与噪声被广泛用作衡量整体视觉运动处理的一种方法。为了定位参与这种表现的人类大脑机制,功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)被用于比较观看连贯运动的随机点时与观看空间和时间上相当的动态噪声时的大脑激活情况。还比较了连贯运动的反转率和连贯运动速度(5度每秒与20度每秒)。通过统计参数映射分析不同条件下局部激活的差异。与噪声相比,在V5和假定的V3A区域发现连贯运动引起的激活更强,但在V1区域则不然。此外,在枕叶腹侧表面、顶内沟和颞上沟有激活焦点。因此,连贯运动信息在多个纹外视觉脑区有独特的作用。运动反转率在运动敏感区域仅显示出微弱的影响。与连贯运动相比,噪声对V1的激活更强,这可能反映了具有更广泛运动选择性的神经元的激活。在将噪声与更快速度进行比较时,这种激活位于更靠前的位置,这表明20度每秒超出了中央视野V1表征的速度范围。这些结果支持将运动连贯性测试用于纹外区域而非V1功能的研究。然而,对运动连贯性的敏感性并不局限于V5,可能还延伸到经典定义的背侧通路之外。