Bergh P, Gunterberg B, Meis-Kindblom J M, Kindblom L G
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, Göteborg, Sweden.
Cancer. 2001 Apr 1;91(7):1201-12. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010401)91:7<1201::aid-cncr1120>3.0.co;2-w.
The surgical treatment of chondrosarcoma of the pelvis, sacrum, and spine is complex and technically demanding. As such, adequate surgical margins have been difficult to achieve, resulting in poor local control and survival. The objective of this study was to assess the outcome of patients with chondrosarcomas in these sites who were treated at a tumor center by using modern, aggressive surgical techniques and to identify prognostic factors.
Sixty-nine consecutive patients with chondrosarcoma of the pelvis (46 cases), sacrum (11 cases), and mobile spine (12 cases) who were treated at Sahlgrenska University Hospital from 1967 to 1999 were included in this study. Demographic information and follow-up data were obtained and statistically analyzed.
There were 53 men and 16 women with a mean age of 45 years and a mean tumor size of 12 cm. There were 61 conventional chondrosarcomas, Grades 1-3 (with 13 arising in a preexisting osteochondroma) and 8 Grade 4 chondrosarcomas (7 dedifferentiated and one mesenchymal). The overall local recurrence rate was 27%, and the estimated overall 5- and 10-year survival rates were 72% and 67%, respectively. In contrast, the observed local recurrence rate was 3% (1 patient) in 31 patients whose conventional chondrosarcomas were resected with adequate surgical margins; 90% of these patients survived and most of them (26 of 31 or 84%) were continuously disease free. Significant factors associated with a worse prognosis with respect to local control and/or survival were high histologic tumor grade, increasing patient age, primary surgery outside of a tumor center, incisional biopsy versus a noninvasive diagnostic procedure, and inadequate surgical margins.
Center-based diagnosis and treatment using modern aggressive surgical techniques significantly improve the prognosis of patients with chondrosarcoma of the pelvis, sacrum, and spine.
骨盆、骶骨和脊柱软骨肉瘤的手术治疗复杂且技术要求高。因此,难以获得足够的手术切缘,导致局部控制不佳和生存率低。本研究的目的是评估在肿瘤中心采用现代积极手术技术治疗的这些部位软骨肉瘤患者的预后,并确定预后因素。
纳入1967年至1999年在萨尔格伦斯卡大学医院接受治疗的69例连续的骨盆(46例)、骶骨(11例)和活动脊柱(12例)软骨肉瘤患者。获取人口统计学信息和随访数据并进行统计分析。
有53名男性和16名女性,平均年龄45岁,平均肿瘤大小12厘米。有61例1-3级传统型软骨肉瘤(其中13例起源于先前存在的骨软骨瘤)和8例4级软骨肉瘤(7例去分化型和1例间叶型)。总体局部复发率为27%,估计5年和10年总生存率分别为72%和67%。相比之下,31例传统型软骨肉瘤经充分手术切缘切除的患者中,观察到的局部复发率为3%(1例患者);这些患者中有90%存活,其中大多数(31例中的26例或84%)持续无病。与局部控制和/或生存预后较差相关的显著因素包括高组织学肿瘤分级、患者年龄增加、在肿瘤中心以外进行初次手术、切开活检与非侵入性诊断程序、以及手术切缘不足。
采用现代积极手术技术进行以中心为基础的诊断和治疗可显著改善骨盆、骶骨和脊柱软骨肉瘤患者的预后。