Whitecloud T S, Roesch W W, Ricciardi J E
Department of Orthopaedics, Tulane University Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, USA.
J Spinal Disord. 2001 Apr;14(2):100-3. doi: 10.1097/00002517-200104000-00002.
Lumbar interbody fusion can be performed anteriorly or posteriorly. An anterior approach generally requires an access surgeon and often is combined with a posterior fusion. A traditional posterior interbody fusion can destabilize the spinal motion segment and requires neural retraction. A new surgical technique, a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), was recently described. It requires minimal neural retraction, and the disk space is exposed posterolaterally with removal of only one facet joint. This study compares the cost of an anterior-posterior one-level lumbar fusion with the cost of the same procedure performed using the TLIF technique. Table 1 lists the specific demographics. A retrospective review of the hospital charges of 80 patients undergoing interbody lumbar stabilization was conducted. The two groups consisted of 40 patients with an anterior-posterior fusion and 40 patients who were fused circumferentially using the TLIF technique. A cost analysis with normalization of 1998 dollars between the two groups was performed. The TLIF group had an average operative time of 213 minutes, compared with 269 minutes for the anterior-posterior group. In addition, an average additional 38 minutes were required to turn the patient from the anterior or posterior position. The average blood loss for the anterior-posterior procedure was 969 mL, compared with 489 mL for the TLIF group. Twenty-three of the anterior-posterior patients received an average of 2.2 units of blood and six of the TLIF patients received an average of 1.3 units. Use of the surgical intensive care unit was much lower in the TLIF group (38 of 40 patients versus 2 of 40 patients). The average length of stay was 6.1 days for the anterior-posterior group compared with an average of 3.3 days for the TLIF group. The average cost of the anterior-posterior patients was $49,085, compared with $33,784 for the TLIF group. Cost analysis between the two groups show the TLIF patients had an average savings of approximately $15,000 per admission. This cost comparison was conducted only for the time of the operative procedure. No attempt was made to analyze rates of fusion between the two groups or ultimate clinic outcome. There were no major complications in either group, and no patient returned to surgery for a lumbar spinal problem at the authors' hospital within 1 year of the index procedure.
腰椎椎间融合术可经前路或后路进行。前路手术一般需要一名脊柱外科医生,且常与后路融合术联合使用。传统的后路椎间融合术可能会破坏脊柱运动节段的稳定性,并且需要牵拉神经。最近有一种新的手术技术——经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)被报道。该技术所需的神经牵拉最少,通过仅切除一个小关节突,从后外侧暴露椎间盘间隙。本研究比较了一期前后路腰椎融合术与采用TLIF技术进行相同手术的费用。表1列出了具体的人口统计学数据。我们对80例行腰椎椎间融合固定术患者的医院收费进行了回顾性研究。两组各有40例患者,一组接受前后路融合术,另一组采用TLIF技术进行环形融合。对两组间以1998年美元进行标准化的费用分析。TLIF组平均手术时间为213分钟,前后路组为269分钟。此外,将患者从前路或后路体位翻转还平均需要额外38分钟。前后路手术的平均失血量为969毫升,TLIF组为489毫升。前后路组的23例患者平均接受了2.2单位的输血,TLIF组的6例患者平均接受了1.3单位的输血。TLIF组使用外科重症监护病房的情况要少得多(40例患者中有38例,前后路组40例患者中有2例)。前后路组的平均住院时间为6.1天,TLIF组平均为3.3天。前后路组患者的平均费用为49,085美元,TLIF组为33,784美元。两组间的费用分析显示,TLIF组患者每次住院平均节省约15,000美元。该费用比较仅针对手术过程中的时间。未对两组间的融合率或最终临床结果进行分析。两组均未出现重大并发症,且在初次手术1年内,作者所在医院没有患者因腰椎问题再次接受手术。