Brinkmann B, Pfeiffer H, Schürenkamp M, Hohoff C
Institut für Rechtsmedizin Münster, Germany.
Int J Legal Med. 2001;114(3):173-7. doi: 10.1007/s004140000174.
In this study, a total of 191 cases with STR exclusions out of 591 paternity cases were analysed using 2 STR sets, i.e. (set a) 5 STRs in 462 cases with 150 exclusions and (set b) 9 STRs in 129 cases with 41 exclusions. Set (a) was associated with four exclusions on average while set (b) showed five exclusionary loci on average. Double exclusions were observed in 18 cases and further elaborated. Of these, 2 ended up with probabilities of paternity of 0.1% and 0.4%, respectively and with a random occurrence of the hypothesis "mutation" of 1:20,000 and 1:50,000, respectively, while all other cases were associated with much lower frequencies. The conclusion is that the evidential value of a set of highly polymorphic STRs applied in paternity cases is usually extremely high.
在本研究中,对591例亲子鉴定案例中的191例STR排除案例进行了分析,使用了2组STR,即(a组)在462例案例中的5个STR,有150例排除;(b组)在129例案例中的9个STR,有41例排除。a组平均有4例排除,而b组平均有5个排除位点。在18例案例中观察到双重排除并进一步阐述。其中,2例最终的父权概率分别为0.1%和0.4%,假设“突变”的随机发生率分别为1:20,000和1:50,000,而所有其他案例的频率要低得多。结论是,应用于亲子鉴定案例中的一组高度多态性STR的证据价值通常极高。