Mueser K T, Sengupta A, Schooler N R, Bellack A S, Xie H, Glick I D, Keith S J
New Hampshire-Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center and Department of Psychiatry, Dartmouth Medical School, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Feb;69(1):3-12.
The effects of 2 family intervention programs (supportive family management [SFM], including monthly support groups for 2 years; or applied family management [AFM], including 1 year of behavioral family therapy plus support groups for 2 years), and 3 different neuroleptic dosage strategies (standard, low, targeted) on social functioning of patients with schizophrenia. their relatives' attitudes, and family burden were examined. AFM was associated with lower rejecting attitudes by relatives toward patients and less friction in the family perceived by patients. Patients in both AFM and SFM improved in social functioning but did not differ, whereas family burden was unchanged. Medication strategy had few effects, nor did it interact with family intervention. The addition of time-limited behavioral family therapy to monthly support groups improved family atmosphere, but did not influence patient social functioning or family burden.
研究了2种家庭干预项目(支持性家庭管理[SFM],包括为期2年的每月支持小组;或应用家庭管理[AFM],包括1年的行为家庭治疗加为期2年的支持小组)以及3种不同的抗精神病药物剂量策略(标准剂量、低剂量、靶向剂量)对精神分裂症患者社会功能、其亲属态度及家庭负担的影响。AFM与亲属对患者较低的排斥态度以及患者所感知到的家庭中较少的摩擦相关。接受AFM和SFM的患者在社会功能方面均有改善,但二者无差异,而家庭负担未变。药物治疗策略影响甚微,且与家庭干预无相互作用。在每月支持小组基础上增加限时行为家庭治疗改善了家庭氛围,但未影响患者社会功能或家庭负担。