Dunn L B, Jeste D V
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001 Jun;24(6):595-607. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(00)00218-9.
Increased scrutiny of informed consent calls for further research into decision making by patients who may be at risk for impairments. We review interventions designed to improve patient understanding of informed consent. A number of studies, within as well as outside psychiatry, have evaluated the effectiveness of specific interventions, as well as possible "predictors" of understanding of consent, such as subject characteristics, psychiatric symptoms, and cognitive impairment. Deficits in patients' understanding of informed consent may be partially related to poorly conceived, written, or organized informed consent materials; these deficits may be remediable with educational interventions. We find that effective interventions include corrected feedback, multiple learning trials, and more organized or simplified consent forms. Educational levels of patients generally correlate with levels of understanding. Even among individuals with psychiatric illness or cognitive impairment, deficits in understanding can be remedied with certain educational interventions. A variety of interventions can enhance understanding of informed consent.
对知情同意的审查日益严格,这就需要对可能存在认知障碍风险的患者的决策过程进行进一步研究。我们回顾了旨在提高患者对知情同意理解的干预措施。精神病学领域内外的多项研究评估了特定干预措施的有效性,以及理解同意书的可能“预测因素”,如受试者特征、精神症状和认知障碍。患者对知情同意理解的不足可能部分与构思不佳、书写不当或组织混乱的知情同意材料有关;这些不足可以通过教育干预得到补救。我们发现有效的干预措施包括纠正性反馈、多次学习试验以及更有条理或简化的同意书形式。患者的教育水平通常与理解程度相关。即使在患有精神疾病或认知障碍的个体中,通过某些教育干预也可以弥补理解方面的不足。多种干预措施可以增强对知情同意的理解。