Mendes J, Nagarajaram H A, Soares C M, Blundell T L, Carrondo M A
Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Apartado 127, Av. da República, 2781-901, Oeiras, Portugal.
Biopolymers. 2001 Aug;59(2):72-86. doi: 10.1002/1097-0282(200108)59:2<72::AID-BIP1007>3.0.CO;2-S.
The performance of the self-consistent mean field theory (SCMFT) method for side-chain modeling, employing rotamer energies calculated with the flexible rotamer model (FRM), is evaluated in the context of comparative modeling of protein structure. Predictions were carried out on a test set of 56 model backbones of varying accuracy, to allow side-chain prediction accuracy to be analyzed as a function of backbone accuracy. A progressive decrease in the accuracy of prediction was observed as backbone accuracy decreased. However, even for very low backbone accuracy, prediction was substantially higher than random, indicating that the FRM can, in part, compensate for the errors in the modeled tertiary environment. It was also investigated whether the introduction in the FRM-SCMFT method of knowledge-based biases, derived from a backbone-dependent rotamer library, could enhance its performance. A bias derived from the backbone-dependent rotamer conformations alone did not improve prediction accuracy. However, a bias derived from the backbone-dependent rotamer probabilities improved prediction accuracy considerably. This bias was incorporated through two different strategies. In one (the indirect strategy), rotamer probabilities were used to reject unlikely rotamers a priori, thus restricting prediction by FRM-SCMFT to a subset containing only the most probable rotamers in the library. In the other (the direct strategy), rotamer energies were transformed into pseudo-energies that were added to the average potential energies of the respective rotamers, thereby creating hybrid energy-based/knowledge-based average rotamer energies, which were used by the FRM-SCMFT method for prediction. For all degrees of backbone accuracy, an optimal strength of the knowledge-based bias existed for both strategies for which predictions were more accurate than pure energy-based predictions, and also than pure knowledge-based predictions. Hybrid knowledge-based/energy-based methods were obtained from both strategies and compared with the SCWRL method, a hybrid method based on the same backbone-dependent rotamer library. The accuracy of the indirect method was approximately the same as that of the SCWRL method, but that of the direct method was significantly higher.
在蛋白质结构比较建模的背景下,评估了采用柔性旋转异构体模型(FRM)计算的旋转异构体能量的自洽平均场理论(SCMFT)方法用于侧链建模的性能。对56个不同精度的模型主链测试集进行了预测,以便将侧链预测精度作为主链精度的函数进行分析。随着主链精度的降低,观察到预测精度逐渐下降。然而,即使对于非常低的主链精度,预测结果也明显高于随机预测,这表明FRM可以部分补偿建模三级环境中的误差。还研究了在FRM-SCMFT方法中引入基于知识的偏差(源自依赖主链的旋转异构体库)是否可以提高其性能。仅从依赖主链的旋转异构体构象得出的偏差并不能提高预测精度。然而,从依赖主链的旋转异构体概率得出的偏差显著提高了预测精度。这种偏差通过两种不同的策略纳入。一种(间接策略)是,旋转异构体概率用于先验地排除不太可能的旋转异构体,从而将FRM-SCMFT的预测限制在仅包含库中最可能的旋转异构体的子集中。另一种(直接策略)是,将旋转异构体能量转换为伪能量,将其添加到各个旋转异构体的平均势能中,从而创建基于能量/基于知识的混合平均旋转异构体能量,FRM-SCMFT方法使用该能量进行预测。对于所有主链精度等级,两种策略都存在基于知识的偏差的最佳强度,在此强度下预测比纯基于能量的预测更准确,也比纯基于知识的预测更准确。从两种策略中都获得了基于知识/基于能量的混合方法,并与SCWRL方法进行了比较,SCWRL方法是一种基于相同依赖主链的旋转异构体库的混合方法。间接方法的精度与SCWRL方法大致相同,但直接方法的精度明显更高。