Bytzer P, Teglbjaerg P S
Department of Medicine M, Glostrup University Hospital, Denmark.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 May;96(5):1409-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03774.x.
The proportion of Helicobacter pylori-negative duodenal ulcer disease appears to be increasing. Data on clinical outcome and prognosis in this subgroup are lacking.
Two hundred seventy-six duodenal ulcer patients randomized, irrespective of H. pylori status, to either eradication therapy or maintenance omeprazole (double-blind, double-dummy design) for 1 yr were studied. Patients were followed up for a total of 2 yr, with visits performed every 2 months the first year and every 6 months the following year. Endoscopies for assessment of ulcer relapse were done at 6 and 12 months or in the event of symptomatic relapse. H. pylori status was assessed by culture, immunohistochemistry, and urea breath test at entry, at 6, 12, and 24 months or at failure. The primary endpoint was discontinuation, irrespective of reason. Patients were considered H. pylori negative if all three tests were negative. Patients were considered H. pylori-positive if any of the three diagnostic tests were positive. Study staff were blinded to H. pylori results.
Thirty-two (12%) patients were H. pylori negative at entry. There were no differences according to H. pylori status for a number of clinical and demographic characteristics. However, H. pylori-negative patients had a shorter history of ulcer symptoms and were more likely to be NSAID users (19% vs 1%, p < 0.001). Only 28% of the H. pylori-negative patients completed the study, as compared with 40% of H. pylori-positive patients (p = 0.0005). The main reasons for the poorer prognosis in H. pylori-negative patients were relapse of ulcer/ulcer not healed (35% vs 26%) and relapse of severe dyspepsia symptoms without ulcer relapse (16% vs 7%). H. pylori-negative patients randomized to eradication therapy left the study early compared with H. pylori-negative patients randomized to long-term omeprazole therapy. Outcome in omeprazole-treated patients did not differ according to H. pylori status (p = 0.3).
Clinical characteristics in H. pylori-negative and positive duodenal ulcer patients differ little. Clinical outcome over 2 yr is significantly poorer in H. pylori-negative patients, especially if treated empirically with eradication therapy. These results suggest that H. pylori infection should be assessed in all duodenal ulcer patients before treatment is decided.
幽门螺杆菌阴性的十二指肠溃疡疾病比例似乎在增加。目前缺乏该亚组患者的临床结局和预后数据。
对276例十二指肠溃疡患者进行研究,不论其幽门螺杆菌状态如何,随机分为根除治疗组或奥美拉唑维持治疗组(双盲、双模拟设计),疗程为1年。患者总共随访2年,第一年每2个月随访一次,次年每6个月随访一次。在6个月和12个月时或出现症状复发时进行内镜检查以评估溃疡复发情况。在入组时、6个月、12个月和24个月时或治疗失败时,通过培养、免疫组织化学和尿素呼气试验评估幽门螺杆菌状态。主要终点为停药,不论原因如何。如果三项检测均为阴性,则患者被视为幽门螺杆菌阴性。如果三项诊断检测中的任何一项为阳性,则患者被视为幽门螺杆菌阳性。研究人员对幽门螺杆菌检测结果不知情。
32例(12%)患者入组时幽门螺杆菌阴性。在一些临床和人口统计学特征方面,根据幽门螺杆菌状态没有差异。然而,幽门螺杆菌阴性的患者溃疡症状病史较短,且更可能是使用非甾体抗炎药的患者(19%对1%,p<0.001)。幽门螺杆菌阴性的患者中只有28%完成了研究,而幽门螺杆菌阳性的患者为40%(p = 0.0005)。幽门螺杆菌阴性患者预后较差的主要原因是溃疡复发/溃疡未愈合(35%对26%)以及无溃疡复发的严重消化不良症状复发(16%对7%)。与随机接受长期奥美拉唑治疗的幽门螺杆菌阴性患者相比,随机接受根除治疗的幽门螺杆菌阴性患者提前退出了研究。奥美拉唑治疗患者的结局根据幽门螺杆菌状态无差异(p = 0.3)。
幽门螺杆菌阴性和阳性的十二指肠溃疡患者临床特征差异不大。幽门螺杆菌阴性患者2年的临床结局明显较差,尤其是接受经验性根除治疗时。这些结果表明,在决定治疗所有十二指肠溃疡患者之前,应评估幽门螺杆菌感染情况。