Stoschitzky K, Koshucharova G, Zweiker R, Maier R, Watzinger N, Fruhwald F M, Klein W
Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Abteilung für Kardiologie, Graz, Austria.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2001 Jun;3(3):343-9. doi: 10.1016/s1388-9842(01)00126-x.
Metoprolol is a beta(1)-selective beta-adrenergic antagonist while carvedilol is a non-selective beta-blocker with additional blockades of alpha(1)-adrenoceptors. Administration of metoprolol has been shown to cause up-regulation of beta-adrenoceptor density and to decrease nocturnal melatonin release, whereas carvedilol lacks these typical effects of beta-blocking drugs.
To compare beta-blocking effects of metoprolol and carvedilol when applied orally in healthy subjects.
We investigated the effects of single oral doses of clinically recommended amounts of metoprolol (50, 100 and 200 mg) and carvedilol (25, 50 and 100 mg) to those of a placebo in a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study in 12 healthy male volunteers. Two hours after oral administration of the drugs heart rate and blood pressure were measured at rest, after 10 min of exercise, and after 15 min of recovery.
Metoprolol tended to decrease heart rate during exercise (-21%, -25% and -24%) to a greater extent than carvedilol (-16%, -16% and -18%). At rest, increasing doses of metoprolol caused decreasing heart rates (62, 60 and 58 beats/min) whereas increasing doses of carvedilol caused increasing heart rates (62, 66 and 69 beats/min), 50 and 100 mg carvedilol failed to differ significantly from the placebo (71 beats/min).
We conclude that clinically recommended doses of carvedilol cause a clinically relevant beta-blockade in humans predominantly during exercise where it appears to be slightly (although not significantly) less effective than metoprolol. On the other hand, the effects of carvedilol on heart rate at rest appear rather weak, particularly in subjects with a low sympathetic tone. This might be caused by a reflex increase on sympathetic drive secondary to peripheral vasodilation resulting from the alpha-blocking effects of the drug. These results might be helpful in explaining why carvedilol, in contrast to metoprolol, may fail to cause up-regulation of beta-adrenoceptor density and does not decrease nocturnal melatonin release. This, in turn, may be a reason for the weak side-effects of carvedilol resulting from the beta-blockade. In addition, our data might be of interest in the interpretation of the forthcoming results of the COMET trial, although it has to be emphasised that they were derived from healthy subjects and, therefore, cannot be directly extrapolated to patients with heart failure.
美托洛尔是一种β₁选择性β肾上腺素能拮抗剂,而卡维地洛是一种非选择性β受体阻滞剂,还能额外阻断α₁肾上腺素能受体。已表明服用美托洛尔会导致β肾上腺素能受体密度上调,并减少夜间褪黑素释放,而卡维地洛缺乏β受体阻滞剂的这些典型作用。
比较美托洛尔和卡维地洛口服给药对健康受试者的β受体阻滞作用。
在一项针对12名健康男性志愿者的随机、双盲、交叉研究中,我们研究了单次口服临床推荐剂量的美托洛尔(50、100和200毫克)和卡维地洛(25、50和100毫克)与安慰剂相比的效果。口服药物两小时后,在静息状态、运动10分钟后以及恢复15分钟后测量心率和血压。
运动期间,美托洛尔使心率降低的程度(分别为-21%、-25%和-2