诱导剂的临床研究。四十三：阿耳法沙龙的恢复情况——与硫喷妥钠和甲己炔巴比妥的比较研究。
Clinical studies of induction agents. XLIII: recovery from althesin--a comparative study with thiopentone and methohexitone.
作者信息
Carson I W, Graham J, Dundee J W
出版信息
Br J Anaesth. 1975 Mar;47(3):358-64. doi: 10.1093/bja/47.3.358.
PMID:1138743
Abstract
A detailed assessment of recovery endpoints and a simple performance test were employed to investigate recovery from anaesthesia. 150 patients participated in a comparative study using different doses of Althesin, thiopentone and methohexitone. Althesin was found to be suitable anaesthetic agent for the outpatient practice, although recovery was not as rapid as that following methohexitone.
摘要
采用对恢复终点的详细评估和一项简单的性能测试来研究麻醉后的恢复情况。150名患者参与了一项使用不同剂量的阿耳法英、硫喷妥钠和甲己炔巴比妥的对比研究。结果发现阿耳法英是适合门诊手术的麻醉剂，尽管其恢复速度不如甲己炔巴比妥之后那么快。
Zotero 插件