Suppr超能文献

口服葡萄糖耐量试验中两小时和一小时血糖水平在皮马印第安人糖尿病诊断中的价值比较。

Comparison of the value of the two- and one-hour glucose levels of the oral GTT in the diagnosis of diabetes in Pima Indians.

作者信息

Rushforth N B, Bennett P H, Steinberg A G, Miller M

出版信息

Diabetes. 1975 Jun;24(6):538-46. doi: 10.2337/diab.24.6.538.

Abstract

In many population and screening studies of diabetes, the one-hour glucose level of the GTT has been used to define the diabetic status of subjects. The one-hour postglucose load determination has been preferred over the two-hour value by many investigators primarily because of convenience and justified on the basis of the high correlation between the two values. Venous plasma glucose levels, one and two hours after 75-gm. carbohydrate load, were determined on over 1600 Pima Indians. In most sex and age groups, the frequency distributions of both the one-hour and two-hour glucose levels were clearly bimodal. By the logarithms of the glucose values these distributions were consistent with a model of two overlapping Gaussian distributions. The data indicate that for the Pima the amount of overlap of the distributions was greater for the one-hour than for the two-hour values. For each sex and decade the probabilities of misclassification of a normal as "hyperglycemic" and vice versa were smaller for the two-hour than for the one-hour values. Such misclassifications for the two-hour levels averaged 6.6 per cent and 11.6 per cent for the one-hour levels. The reproducivility of the GTT taken one to three weeks apart in a sample of ninety-nine Pima Indians showed that the two-hour level was superior to the one-hour level as measured by the mean values of the absolute difference between log GTT levels for test and retest values. The one-hour measurements also gave more disagreements between the classifications of diabetic status than the two-hour test values. If a single measure of glucose tolerance is to be selected for the diagnosis of diabetes among Pima Indians, these data provide a mathematical rationale for preferring the two-hour level to the one-hour determination.

摘要

在许多糖尿病的人群和筛查研究中,口服葡萄糖耐量试验(GTT)的1小时血糖水平已被用于定义受试者的糖尿病状态。许多研究者更倾向于采用葡萄糖负荷后1小时的测定值而非2小时的测定值,主要是因为其便利性,并且基于这两个值之间的高度相关性,这种做法是合理的。对1600多名皮马印第安人测定了75克碳水化合物负荷后1小时和2小时的静脉血浆葡萄糖水平。在大多数性别和年龄组中,1小时和2小时血糖水平的频率分布均明显呈双峰状。通过对葡萄糖值取对数,这些分布与两个重叠的高斯分布模型一致。数据表明,对于皮马人来说,1小时测定值的分布重叠量大于2小时测定值。对于每个性别和年龄段,将正常误分类为“高血糖”以及反之的概率,2小时测定值比1小时测定值要小。2小时水平的这种误分类平均为6.6%,1小时水平的误分类平均为11.6%。在99名皮马印第安人的样本中,间隔1至3周进行的口服葡萄糖耐量试验的重复性表明,以测试值和复测值的对数GTT水平之间绝对差值的平均值来衡量,2小时水平优于1小时水平。1小时测量在糖尿病状态分类上的分歧也比2小时测试值更多。如果要在皮马印第安人中选择单一的葡萄糖耐量测量方法来诊断糖尿病,这些数据为优先选择2小时水平而非1小时测定值提供了数学依据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验