Kane R A
Division of Health Services Research and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Gerontologist. 2001 Jun;41(3):293-304. doi: 10.1093/geront/41.3.293.
Long-term care policies and programs in the United States suffer from a major flaw: They are balanced toward a model of nursing home care that, regardless of its technical quality, tends to be associated with a poor quality of life for consumers. This article proposes quality-of-life domains-namely, security, comfort, meaningful activity, relationships, enjoyment, dignity, autonomy, privacy, individuality, spiritual well-being, and functional competence. It argues that these kinds of quality-of-life outcomes are minimized in current quality assessment and given credence only after health and safety outcomes are considered. Five trends are reviewed that might lead to a more consumer-centered emphasis on quality of life: the disability rights movement, the emphasis on consumer direction, the growth of assisted living, increasing attention to physical environments, and efforts to bring about culture change in nursing homes. Building on these trends, the article concludes with strategies to move beyond current stalemates and polarized arguments toward forms of long-term care that are more compatible with a good quality of life.
它们倾向于以养老院护理模式为导向,而这种模式无论其技术质量如何,往往都与消费者较差的生活质量相关联。本文提出了生活质量的多个领域,即安全、舒适、有意义的活动、人际关系、享受、尊严、自主、隐私、个性、精神福祉和功能能力。文章认为,在当前的质量评估中,这些生活质量成果被最小化,只有在考虑了健康和安全成果之后才会受到重视。本文回顾了可能导致更以消费者为中心、注重生活质量的五个趋势:残疾人权利运动、对消费者导向的强调、辅助生活的发展、对物理环境的日益关注,以及在养老院推动文化变革的努力。基于这些趋势,文章最后提出了一些策略,以超越当前的僵局和两极分化的争论,走向更符合优质生活的长期护理形式。