Suppr超能文献

[加泰罗尼亚评估家庭医生临床能力的初步经验]

[First experiences in evaluating the clinical competence of family doctors in Catalonia].

作者信息

Ruiz I Gil E, Florensa I Claramunt E, Cots I Yago J, Sellarès Salas J, Iruela López A, Blay Pueyo C, Morera Castell R, Martínez Carretero J

机构信息

Societat Catalana de Medicina Familiar i Comunitària e Institut d'Estudis de la Salut. Barcelona.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2001 Jun 30;28(2):105-9. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(01)78909-3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To construct a valid instrument to evaluate the clinical competence of family doctors and establish professional standards.

DESIGN

Construction of an objective and structured clinical evaluation test by the Test Committee of the Catalan Society of Family and Community Medicine (SCMFiC) with 27 representative clinical situations of primary care practice. This used various evaluative instruments and lasted 5 hours and 30 minutes.

SETTING

2 Barcelona health districts for the two runnings of the test.

PARTICIPANTS

Family doctors, SCMFiC members, who took part voluntarily after having been invited by letter.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

23 doctors took part in the first running of the test. Their average age was 36.6 (SD 6.9) and 52.2% of them were women. 46 doctors took part in the second test. Their average age was 30.9 (SD 2.1) and 76.1 were women. The test had an overall reliability coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) of 0.83 the first time and 0.65 the second time. The overall mean score of the participants the first time was 56.9 (SD 19.2), with 100 the top score possible, and 62.1 (SD 4.1) the second time.

CONCLUSIONS

This SCMFiC experiment is the first time the clinical competence of family doctors has been assessed in our area. It was a reliable and valid test to assess the competence of our health professionals.

摘要

目的

构建一种有效的工具来评估家庭医生的临床能力并确立专业标准。

设计

加泰罗尼亚家庭与社区医学协会(SCMFiC)测试委员会构建了一项客观且结构化的临床评估测试,其中包含27个具有代表性的基层医疗实践临床情境。该测试使用了多种评估工具,时长为5小时30分钟。

地点

在巴塞罗那的2个卫生区进行了两轮测试。

参与者

家庭医生,即SCMFiC成员,他们在收到邀请信后自愿参加。

测量与主要结果

23名医生参加了第一轮测试。他们的平均年龄为36.6岁(标准差6.9),其中52.2%为女性。46名医生参加了第二轮测试。他们的平均年龄为30.9岁(标准差2.1),其中76.1%为女性。该测试的总体信度系数(克朗巴哈系数)第一轮为0.83,第二轮为0.65。参与者的第一轮总体平均分为56.9分(标准差19.2),满分100分,第二轮为62.1分(标准差4.1)。

结论

SCMFiC的这项实验是我们地区首次对家庭医生的临床能力进行评估。这是一项评估我们卫生专业人员能力的可靠且有效的测试。

相似文献

1
[First experiences in evaluating the clinical competence of family doctors in Catalonia].
Aten Primaria. 2001 Jun 30;28(2):105-9. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(01)78909-3.
2
[Evaluation of clinical competence of family medicine trainer].
Aten Primaria. 2004 Jun 30;34(2):68-72. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(04)79461-5.
3
Is knowledge a barrier to implementing low back pain guidelines? Assessing the knowledge of Israeli family doctors.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):785-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00847.x. Epub 2008 Mar 24.
6
[Design of a method for the evaluation of clinical competence in primary care].
Aten Primaria. 2000 Nov 30;26(9):590-4. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(00)78729-4.
9
[Should we assess family doctors for competence?].
Aten Primaria. 2002 Nov 30;30(9):539-40. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(02)79101-4.
10
[Evaluation of a training model for health professionals in the care of critical patients: AIPCAP Study].
Aten Primaria. 2020 Mar;52(3):151-158. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2018.08.009. Epub 2019 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
[Need for primary care training in rare diseases].
Aten Primaria. 2006 Oct 15;38(6):345-8. doi: 10.1157/13093372.
2
[Evaluation of clinical competence of family medicine trainer].
Aten Primaria. 2004 Jun 30;34(2):68-72. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(04)79461-5.
3
[Should we assess family doctors for competence?].
Aten Primaria. 2002 Nov 30;30(9):539-40. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(02)79101-4.
4
[Physical examination targeted at problems].
Aten Primaria. 2002 Jun 15;30(1):32-45. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(02)78961-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of clinical skills with standardized patients: state of the art revisited.
Teach Learn Med. 2013;25 Suppl 1:S17-25. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2013.842916.
2
The educational value of an OSCE in a family practice residency.
Acad Med. 1997 Aug;72(8):722-4. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199708000-00020.
4
5
Technical issues: test application. AAMC.
Acad Med. 1993 Jun;68(6):454-60; discussion 461-3. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199306000-00003.
7
Set up and run an objective structured clinical exam.
BMJ. 1995 May 6;310(6988):1187-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6988.1187.
9
How can we test clinical reasoning?
Lancet. 1995 Apr 22;345(8956):1032-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90763-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验