Cummings T M, White A R
British Medical Acupuncture Society, London, England.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Jul;82(7):986-92. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.24023.
To establish whether there is evidence for or against the efficacy of needling as a treatment approach for myofascial trigger point pain.
PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, AMED, and CISCOM databases, searched from inception to July 999.
Randomized, controlled trials in which some form of needling therapy was used to treat myofascial pain.
Two reviewers independently extracted data concerning trial methods, quality, and outcomes.
Twenty-three papers were included. No trials were of sufficient quality or design to test the efficacy of any needling technique beyond placebo in the treatment of myofascial pain. Eight of the 10 trials comparing injection of different substances and all 7 higher quality trials found that the effect was independent of the injected substance. All 3 trials that compared dry needling with injection found no difference in effect.
Direct needling of myofascial trigger points appears to be an effective treatment, but the hypothesis that needling therapies have efficacy beyond placebo is neither supported nor refuted by the evidence from clinical trials. Any effect of these therapies is likely because of the needle or placebo rather than the injection of either saline or active drug. Controlled trials are needed to investigate whether needling has an effect beyond placebo on myofascial trigger point pain.
确定是否有证据支持或反对针刺作为治疗肌筋膜触发点疼痛的一种方法的疗效。
检索了PubMed、Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、AMED和CISCOM数据库,检索时间从建库至999年7月。
使用某种形式的针刺疗法治疗肌筋膜疼痛的随机对照试验。
两名评价员独立提取有关试验方法、质量和结果的数据。
纳入了23篇论文。没有足够高质量或设计良好的试验来检验任何针刺技术在治疗肌筋膜疼痛方面优于安慰剂的疗效。在比较注射不同物质的10项试验中,有8项试验以及所有7项质量较高的试验发现,疗效与注射物质无关。比较干针疗法与注射疗法的所有3项试验均未发现疗效有差异。
直接针刺肌筋膜触发点似乎是一种有效的治疗方法,但针刺疗法疗效优于安慰剂这一假设既未得到临床试验证据的支持,也未被其反驳。这些疗法的任何效果可能是由于针刺或安慰剂,而非盐水或活性药物的注射。需要进行对照试验来研究针刺在治疗肌筋膜触发点疼痛方面是否有优于安慰剂的效果。