Lightner D, Calvosa C, Andersen R, Klimberg I, Brito C G, Snyder J, Gleason D, Killion D, Macdonald J, Khan A U, Diokno A, Sirls L T, Saltzstein D
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
Urology. 2001 Jul;58(1):12-5. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01148-7.
To assess the safety and effectiveness of Durasphere compared with bovine collagen in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD).
This multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial was composed of 355 women diagnosed with SUI due to ISD and used a standardized pad test and the Stamey continence grade as the primary endpoints. The participants' ages ranged from 26 to 84 years. All patients had an abdominal leak point pressure of less than 90 cm H(2)O (average 51).
At 12 months after the first injection, the two materials were equivalent with respect to the improvement in continence grade and pad weight testing. Less Durasphere was injected to obtain comparable clinical results (Durasphere 4.83 mL versus bovine collagen 6.23 mL, P <0.001). When examined 1 year after the date of the last treatment, 49 (80.3%) of the 61 women treated with Durasphere showed improvement of 1 continence grade or more compared with 47 (69.1%) of 68 women treated with bovine collagen (P value for difference = 0.162). Although the adverse events reported for both groups were similar, the Durasphere group had an increased short-term risk of urgency and urinary retention.
The use of Durasphere for the treatment of SUI due to ISD was equally effective as bovine collagen and used less material. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted market approval for Durasphere on September 13, 1999. The product design and initial clinical data suggest the potential for greater durability of the clinical benefit, with the possibility of a permanent solution for SUI due to ISD in some patients.
评估与牛胶原蛋白相比,聚氨基葡糖(Durasphere)治疗内在括约肌缺陷(ISD)所致压力性尿失禁(SUI)的安全性和有效性。
这项多中心、随机、对照、双盲试验纳入了355名被诊断为ISD所致SUI的女性,采用标准化的尿垫试验和Stamey尿失禁分级作为主要终点。参与者年龄在26至84岁之间。所有患者的腹压漏尿点压力均低于90 cm H₂O(平均51)。
首次注射后12个月,两种材料在尿失禁分级改善和尿垫重量测试方面效果相当。注射较少的聚氨基葡糖就能获得可比的临床效果(聚氨基葡糖4.83 mL,牛胶原蛋白6.23 mL,P<0.001)。在最后一次治疗日期1年后进行检查时,61名接受聚氨基葡糖治疗的女性中有49名(80.3%)尿失禁分级改善了1级或更多,而68名接受牛胶原蛋白治疗的女性中有47名(69.1%)有同样改善(差异P值 = 0.162)。虽然两组报告的不良事件相似,但聚氨基葡糖组短期尿急和尿潴留风险增加。
聚氨基葡糖用于治疗ISD所致SUI与牛胶原蛋白同样有效,且用量更少。美国食品药品监督管理局于1999年9月13日批准聚氨基葡糖上市。产品设计和初始临床数据表明临床益处可能更持久,在一些患者中有可能为ISD所致SUI提供永久性解决方案。