Suppr超能文献

粗大运动任务中的反射-冲动风格与概念节奏

Reflective-impulsive style and conceptual tempo in a gross motor task.

作者信息

Keller J, Ripoll H

机构信息

Laboratoire des Sciences du Sport, Université René Descartes, Paris, France.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 2001 Jun;92(3 Pt 1):739-49. doi: 10.2466/pms.2001.92.3.739.

Abstract

The reflective-impulsive construct refers to responses made slowly or quickly in a situation with high uncertainty. Children who are labeled "reflective" take a longer time to respond and make few errors, whereas "impulsive" children are fast and inaccurate. Although the validity of the test and the definition of reflective-impulsive style are well accepted, whether such respond fast or slow to all tasks is questioned. Some children do not fit the dichotomy. Two other groups arise, the fast-accurate and the slow-inaccurate. The response styles of 86 boys, ages 5, 7, and 9 years performing a gross motor task, i.e., hitting a ball with a racquet, were studied. Analysis indicated that the slowest children on the Matching Familiar Figures Test can be faster than the fastest ones and remain more accurate. As the definition of the reflective-impulsive style is based on time, the reflective ones might better be viewed as children who can adapt the response time to the context and thus be more efficient at problem-solving.

摘要

反思-冲动结构指的是在高度不确定的情况下做出的缓慢或快速反应。被标记为“反思型”的儿童需要更长时间做出反应且犯错较少,而“冲动型”儿童反应迅速但不准确。尽管该测试的效度以及反思-冲动风格的定义已被广泛接受,但对于是否在所有任务中都如此快速或缓慢地做出反应仍存在疑问。一些儿童并不符合这种二分法。另外出现了两组,即快速准确型和缓慢不准确型。对86名5岁、7岁和9岁男孩执行一项大肌肉动作任务(即用球拍击球)时的反应风格进行了研究。分析表明,在匹配熟悉图形测试中最慢的儿童可能比最快的儿童速度更快且准确性更高。由于反思-冲动风格的定义基于时间,反思型儿童或许更应被视为能够根据情境调整反应时间从而在解决问题时更高效的儿童。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验