Lema I, Rodríguez-Ares M T, Gómez-Torreiro M, Peñalver M D
Instituto Galego de Oftalmoloxía and Hospital Clínico Universitario, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Cornea. 2001 Aug;20(6):635-8. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200108000-00015.
To compare the adherence of Acanthamoeba trophozoites and cysts to two types of unworn conventional and disposable contact lenses included in groups 1 and 4 of the Food and Drug Administration and to assess the adherence to the center and edge of the lenses.
We used 10 conventional and 10 disposable contact lenses belonging to groups 1 and 4 of the Food and Drug Administration. Each lens was divided into four segments. A human corneal isolate of Acanthamoeba suspended in saline (1x 105 amoebae/mL) was used. Lens segments were exposed to Acanthamoeba cysts and trophozoites for 2 hours. After removal, the count was made with an optical microscope at 100x magnification. Three fields at the center and three fields at the edge were read on each segment.
Acanthamoeba adhered to both types of contact lenses, with a proportion of trophozoites to cysts between 6:4 and 7:3. There was a significantly higher adherence to disposable (8.14 +/- 3.57 organisms/mm(2)) than to conventional (4.94 +/- 2.33 organisms/mm(2)) (p < 0.0001) contact lenses. We also found that the greatest adherence was to the edge of the conventional (12.05 +/- 4.03 organisms/mm(2)) and disposable (26.10 +/- 7.84 organisms/mm(2) (p < 0.0001) contact lenses.
This study shows that Acanthamoeba has varying adherence affinity for different new hydrogel contact lenses. The affinity for disposable lenses (etafilcon A) is significantly higher than that for conventional lenses (polymacon). This adherence is greater for ionic material and high water content. The use of low water content, nonionic contact lenses may reduce the adherence of Acanthamoeba. Finally, the edge may play an important role as an Acanthamoeba vector.
比较棘阿米巴滋养体和包囊对美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)1组和4组中两种未使用过的传统型和一次性隐形眼镜的黏附情况,并评估其在镜片中心和边缘的黏附情况。
我们使用了属于FDA 1组和4组的10片传统隐形眼镜和10片一次性隐形眼镜。每片镜片分为四个部分。使用一种悬浮于盐水中(1×10⁵个阿米巴/毫升)的人角膜分离棘阿米巴。将镜片部分暴露于棘阿米巴包囊和滋养体中2小时。移除后,在100倍放大倍数下用光学显微镜计数。在每个部分的中心读取三个视野,边缘读取三个视野。
棘阿米巴黏附于两种类型的隐形眼镜,滋养体与包囊的比例在6:4至7:3之间。一次性隐形眼镜(8.14±3.57个生物体/平方毫米)的黏附率显著高于传统隐形眼镜(4.94±2.33个生物体/平方毫米)(p<0.0001)。我们还发现,传统隐形眼镜(12.05±4.03个生物体/平方毫米)和一次性隐形眼镜(26.10±7.84个生物体/平方毫米)(p<0.0001)边缘的黏附率最高。
本研究表明,棘阿米巴对不同的新型水凝胶隐形眼镜具有不同的黏附亲和力。对一次性镜片(依他氟康A)的亲和力显著高于传统镜片(聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯)。离子材料和高含水量的镜片这种黏附性更强。使用低含水量、非离子型隐形眼镜可能会降低棘阿米巴的黏附。最后,镜片边缘可能作为棘阿米巴载体发挥重要作用。