Pompidou A
l'Université René Descartes.
Bull Mem Acad R Med Belg. 2000;155(10-12):404-14.
Just as what we can all "technoscience" is emerging in our everyday life, a reflection should be conducted concerning the implications of the scientific and technical progress within our society from now on globalised. We will tackle successively: 1. The ambiguities and paradoxes related to the development of new technologies: in the field of bioethics: artificial reproduction, mammal cloning, genetically modified organisms. towards the ethics of new technologies: ethics of information and communication technologies and ethics of space policy; 2. Nature, foundation and characteristics of the ethical approach; the precaution principle must be completed with two other principles: the principle of experience and the principle of vigilance; 3. The modalities of a democratic management of the ethical approach: it is a matter of defining the role of the three main actors, i.e.: experts, politicians and citizens representing public opinion. It is necessary to promote the ethical approach within a democratic context, that is to ensure a dialogue between experts, policy decision-makers and public opinion on all of the applications of science and technology. It is from such a permanent and renewed dialogue that will emerge the image we give from ourselves in the present world.
正如我们如今在日常生活中都能感受到“技术科学”的兴起一样,对于科学技术进步在我们这个现已全球化的社会中的影响,应当进行一番思考。我们将依次探讨:1. 与新技术发展相关的模糊性和悖论:在生物伦理领域,如人工生殖、哺乳动物克隆、转基因生物;以及新技术伦理,如信息与通信技术伦理和空间政策伦理;2. 伦理方法的本质、基础和特征:预防原则必须由另外两个原则加以补充,即经验原则和警惕原则;3. 伦理方法的民主管理模式:这涉及确定三个主要行为体的角色,即专家、政治家以及代表公众舆论的公民。有必要在民主背景下推动伦理方法,也就是要确保专家、政策决策者和公众舆论就科学技术的所有应用展开对话。正是通过这样一场持续不断且与时俱进的对话,我们在当今世界所展现出的自身形象才会得以呈现。