Suppr超能文献

[从生物伦理学到新技术伦理]

[From bioethics to the new technology ethics].

作者信息

Pompidou A

机构信息

l'Université René Descartes.

出版信息

Bull Mem Acad R Med Belg. 2000;155(10-12):404-14.

Abstract

Just as what we can all "technoscience" is emerging in our everyday life, a reflection should be conducted concerning the implications of the scientific and technical progress within our society from now on globalised. We will tackle successively: 1. The ambiguities and paradoxes related to the development of new technologies: in the field of bioethics: artificial reproduction, mammal cloning, genetically modified organisms. towards the ethics of new technologies: ethics of information and communication technologies and ethics of space policy; 2. Nature, foundation and characteristics of the ethical approach; the precaution principle must be completed with two other principles: the principle of experience and the principle of vigilance; 3. The modalities of a democratic management of the ethical approach: it is a matter of defining the role of the three main actors, i.e.: experts, politicians and citizens representing public opinion. It is necessary to promote the ethical approach within a democratic context, that is to ensure a dialogue between experts, policy decision-makers and public opinion on all of the applications of science and technology. It is from such a permanent and renewed dialogue that will emerge the image we give from ourselves in the present world.

摘要

正如我们如今在日常生活中都能感受到“技术科学”的兴起一样,对于科学技术进步在我们这个现已全球化的社会中的影响,应当进行一番思考。我们将依次探讨:1. 与新技术发展相关的模糊性和悖论:在生物伦理领域,如人工生殖、哺乳动物克隆、转基因生物;以及新技术伦理,如信息与通信技术伦理和空间政策伦理;2. 伦理方法的本质、基础和特征:预防原则必须由另外两个原则加以补充,即经验原则和警惕原则;3. 伦理方法的民主管理模式:这涉及确定三个主要行为体的角色,即专家、政治家以及代表公众舆论的公民。有必要在民主背景下推动伦理方法,也就是要确保专家、政策决策者和公众舆论就科学技术的所有应用展开对话。正是通过这样一场持续不断且与时俱进的对话,我们在当今世界所展现出的自身形象才会得以呈现。

相似文献

1
[From bioethics to the new technology ethics].
Bull Mem Acad R Med Belg. 2000;155(10-12):404-14.
2
Democracy and bioethical controversies.
J Int Bioethique. 2007 Mar-Jun;18(1-2):21-7, 219. doi: 10.3917/jib.181.0021.
4
Beyond the Hippocratic Oath: bioethics and law.
Reseaux Ciephum. 1987;Nos. 53-54:77-92.
5
An inquiry concerning future health care technology: methods and general results.
Health Policy. 1987;8(3):251-64. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(87)90002-9.
6
Wanted: a new ethics field for health policy analysis.
Health Care Anal. 2005 Dec;13(4):247-60. doi: 10.1007/s10728-005-8123-3.
7
[National ethics committees and representative democracy: is the new German ethics committee more "democratic"?].
J Int Bioethique. 2007 Mar-Jun;18(1-2):131-45, 226. doi: 10.3917/jib.181.0131.
8
From 'implications' to 'dimensions': science, medicine and ethics in society.
Health Care Anal. 2013 Mar;21(1):31-42. doi: 10.1007/s10728-012-0219-y.
9
Care and the self: biotechnology, reproduction, and the good life.
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2007 May 4;2:6. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-2-6.
10
Dynamics of the bioethics dialogue in a Spain in transition.
Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1990;24(4):521-9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验