Suppr超能文献

肌肉骨骼损伤中的伤口冲洗

Wound irrigation in musculoskeletal injury.

作者信息

Anglen J O

机构信息

Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia 65212, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001 Jul-Aug;9(4):219-26. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200107000-00001.

Abstract

Wound irrigation to remove debris and lessen bacterial contamination is an essential component of open fracture care. However, considerable practice variation exists in the details of technique. Volume is an important factor; increased volume improves wound cleansing to a point, but the optimal volume is unknown. High-pressure flow has been shown to remove more bacteria and debris and to lower the rate of wound infection compared with low-pressure irrigation, although recent in vitro and animal studies suggest that it may also damage bone. Pulsatile flow has not been demonstrated to increase efficacy. Antiseptic additives can kill bacteria in the wound, but host-tissue toxicities limit their use. Animal and clinical studies of the use of antiseptics in contaminated wounds have yielded conflicting outcomes. Antibiotic irrigation has been effective in experimental studies in some types of animal wounds, but human clinical data are unconvincing due to poor study design. There are few animal or clinical studies of musculoskeletal wounds. Detergent irrigation aims to remove, rather than kill, bacteria and has shown promise in animal models of the complex contaminated musculoskeletal wound.

摘要

伤口冲洗以清除碎屑并减少细菌污染是开放性骨折治疗的重要组成部分。然而,在技术细节方面存在很大的实践差异。冲洗量是一个重要因素;冲洗量增加在一定程度上可改善伤口清洁,但最佳冲洗量尚不清楚。与低压冲洗相比,高压冲洗已被证明能清除更多细菌和碎屑,并降低伤口感染率,尽管最近的体外和动物研究表明,高压冲洗也可能损害骨骼。尚未证明脉动流能提高疗效。抗菌添加剂可杀死伤口中的细菌,但宿主组织毒性限制了它们的使用。在污染伤口中使用抗菌剂的动物和临床研究结果相互矛盾。抗生素冲洗在某些类型动物伤口的实验研究中有效,但由于研究设计不佳,人类临床数据缺乏说服力。关于肌肉骨骼伤口的动物或临床研究很少。洗涤剂冲洗旨在清除而非杀死细菌,并且在复杂污染的肌肉骨骼伤口动物模型中显示出前景。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验