Antkowiak B
Max-Planck-Institut für biologische Kybernetik, Tübingen, Germany.
Naturwissenschaften. 2001 May;88(5):201-13. doi: 10.1007/s001140100230.
Almost a century ago, Meyer and Overton discovered a linear relationship between the potency of anaesthetic agents to induce general anaesthesia and their ability to accumulate in olive oil. Similar correlations between anaesthetic potency and lipid solubility were later reported from investigations on various experimental model systems. However, exceptions to the Meyer-Overton correlation exist in all these systems, indicating that lipid solubility is an important, but not the sole determinant of anaesthetic action. In the mammalian central nervous system, most general anaesthetics act at multiple molecular sites. It seems likely that not all of these effects are involved in anaesthesia. GABAA- and NMDA-receptor/ion channels have already been identified as relevant targets. However, further mechanisms, such as a blockade of Na+ channels and an activation of K+ channels, also come into play. A comparison of different anaesthetics seems to show that each compound has its own spectrum of molecular actions and thus shows specific, fingerprint-like effects on different levels of neuronal activity. This may explain why there is no known compound that specifically antagonises general anaesthesia. General anaesthesia is a multidimensional phenomenon. Unconsciousness, amnesia, analgesia, loss of sensory processing and the depression of spinal motor reflexes are important components. It was not realised until very recently that different molecular mechanisms might underlie these different components. These findings challenge traditional views, such as the assumption that one anaesthetic can be freely replaced by another.
近一个世纪前,迈耶(Meyer)和奥弗顿(Overton)发现麻醉剂诱导全身麻醉的效力与其在橄榄油中蓄积的能力之间存在线性关系。后来,在对各种实验模型系统的研究中也报道了麻醉效力与脂溶性之间的类似相关性。然而,在所有这些系统中都存在迈耶-奥弗顿相关性的例外情况,这表明脂溶性是麻醉作用的一个重要但非唯一决定因素。在哺乳动物中枢神经系统中,大多数全身麻醉剂作用于多个分子位点。似乎并非所有这些效应都与麻醉有关。γ-氨基丁酸A型(GABAA)和N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体/离子通道已被确定为相关靶点。然而,其他机制,如对钠离子通道的阻断和钾离子通道的激活,也发挥了作用。对不同麻醉剂的比较似乎表明,每种化合物都有其自身的分子作用谱,因此对不同水平的神经元活动表现出特定的、类似指纹的效应。这可能解释了为什么不存在已知的能特异性拮抗全身麻醉的化合物。全身麻醉是一种多维现象。意识丧失、失忆、镇痛、感觉处理丧失和脊髓运动反射抑制是重要组成部分。直到最近才意识到,这些不同的组成部分可能有不同的分子机制作为基础。这些发现挑战了传统观点,比如一种麻醉剂可以被另一种麻醉剂自由替代的假设。