Warman K L, Silver E J, Stein R E
Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461, USA.
Pediatrics. 2001 Aug;108(2):277-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.2.277.
Asthma is a major cause of morbidity that disproportionately affects inner-city children. For children with persistent asthma, defined as having asthma symptoms 3 or more days per week or 3 or more nights per month, national guidelines recommend the use of daily antiinflammatory agents. Despite these recommendations, antiinflammatory agents remain underused, particularly in inner-city children with high asthma morbidity.
The objectives of our study were to determine: 1) whether persistent asthma symptoms in inner-city children are related to acute care utilization and to the frequency of acute exacerbations; 2) whether children with persistent asthma are receiving recommended daily antiinflammatory agents; and 3) whether antiinflammatory medication use relates to sociodemographic factors, caretaker self-efficacy, the frequency of primary care visits, and/or measures of quality asthma care.
A 64-item telephone survey was administered between July 1996 and June 1997 to 219 parental caretakers of 2- to 12-year-old children who had been hospitalized with asthma at an inner-city medical center between January 1995 and February 1996. Persistent asthma symptoms were assessed by inquiring about the frequency of daily and nocturnal asthma symptoms over the last 4 weeks. Children's asthma severity was classified by applying the 1997 National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) Asthma Guidelines' severity classification scheme based on the frequency of asthma symptoms. Asthma morbidity was defined as the frequency of acute asthma exacerbations, emergency department visits and hospitalizations. Daily antiinflammatory medication use was compared by sociodemographic factors, caretaker self-efficacy, frequency of primary care visits, and measures of quality asthma home management.
In this sample, quantifying persistent asthma symptoms and applying the NAEPP symptom criteria identified 17% of the children with mild intermittent asthma, 27% with mild persistent asthma and 56% with moderate to severe persistent asthma. There were no differences in the age of the children in the 3 groups (mean age: 6 years). Asthma morbidity, as measured by the number of asthma exacerbations in the last 6 months, was significantly higher in the children with moderate to severe persistent asthma compared with children with mild intermittent asthma (9.8 vs 3.5) or mild persistent asthma (9.8 vs 4.5). In addition, there were significantly more emergency department visits in the moderate to severe group than in the mild persistent (3.05 vs 1.69) or mild intermittent group (3.05 vs 1.76). Lastly, as asthma symptom frequency increased, there were trends toward more hospitalizations and more days hospitalized. Overall, 35% of the 219 families reported giving daily antiinflammatory medications to their child (mostly cromolyn sodium). Of the 181 children (83%) who met NAEPP symptom criteria for persistent asthma, only 39% were receiving daily antiinflammatory treatment. Of the children with symptoms of moderate to severe asthma, only 15% were receiving inhaled steroids in contrast to the guidelines' recommendations. Use of antiinflammatory agents was not related to caretaker sociodemographic factors or self-efficacy scores. Measures of quality asthma home management, which included use of mattress covers, written plans, and peak flow meters, correlated positively with use of antiinflammatory agents. Children whose families reported using daily antiinflammatory medications had more primary care visits in the last 6 months than those children not receiving antiinflammatory medications.
Questioning parents about the frequency of their child's asthma symptoms is an important, inexpensive, and readily accessible bedside and office tool that may aid in the detection of persistent symptoms and help direct therapy. Our study suggests that classifying asthma severity by quantifying persistent asthma symptoms, as defined in the NAEPP Guidelines, is a clinically useful tool that relates to asthma morbidity. In our sample of previously hospitalized children with asthma, 83% met 1997 NAEPP symptom criteria for persistent asthma, and yet only 35% were receiving daily antiinflammatory agents. Use of antiinflammatory agents correlated positively with other indicators of quality asthma home management. Additional work is necessary to increase appropriate use of antiinflammatory agents in this population, and in particular, to increase inhaled steroid use for children with moderate or severe symptoms.
哮喘是发病的主要原因,对市中心区儿童的影响尤为严重。对于持续性哮喘患儿(定义为每周有3天或更多天、每月有3个或更多夜晚出现哮喘症状),国家指南建议使用每日抗炎药物。尽管有这些建议,但抗炎药物的使用仍然不足,尤其是在哮喘发病率高的市中心区儿童中。
我们研究的目的是确定:1)市中心区儿童的持续性哮喘症状是否与急诊就医及急性加重的频率有关;2)持续性哮喘患儿是否正在接受推荐的每日抗炎药物治疗;3)抗炎药物的使用是否与社会人口统计学因素、照顾者自我效能、初级保健就诊频率和/或哮喘优质护理措施有关。
1996年7月至1997年6月,对1995年1月至1996年2月间在市中心区医疗中心因哮喘住院的2至12岁儿童的219名家长照顾者进行了一项包含64个项目的电话调查。通过询问过去4周内每日和夜间哮喘症状的频率来评估持续性哮喘症状。根据1997年国家哮喘教育与预防计划(NAEPP)哮喘指南的严重程度分类方案,依据哮喘症状的频率对儿童哮喘的严重程度进行分类。哮喘发病率定义为急性哮喘加重、急诊就诊和住院的频率。通过社会人口统计学因素、照顾者自我效能、初级保健就诊频率和哮喘家庭优质管理措施对每日抗炎药物的使用情况进行比较。
在这个样本中,通过量化持续性哮喘症状并应用NAEPP症状标准,确定17%的儿童为轻度间歇性哮喘,27%为轻度持续性哮喘,56%为中度至重度持续性哮喘。三组儿童的年龄无差异(平均年龄:6岁)。以过去6个月内哮喘加重的次数衡量,中度至重度持续性哮喘患儿的哮喘发病率显著高于轻度间歇性哮喘患儿(9.8比3.5)或轻度持续性哮喘患儿(9.8比4.5)。此外,中度至重度组的急诊就诊次数明显多于轻度持续性组(3.05比1.69)或轻度间歇性组(3.05比1.76)。最后,随着哮喘症状频率的增加,住院次数和住院天数有增加的趋势。总体而言,219个家庭中有35%报告给孩子使用每日抗炎药物(主要是色甘酸钠)。在符合NAEPP持续性哮喘症状标准的181名儿童(83%)中,只有39%接受每日抗炎治疗。在有中度至重度哮喘症状的儿童中,只有15%按照指南建议使用吸入性类固醇。抗炎药物的使用与照顾者的社会人口统计学因素或自我效能得分无关。哮喘家庭优质管理措施,包括使用床垫套、书面计划和峰流速仪,与抗炎药物的使用呈正相关。其家庭报告使用每日抗炎药物的儿童在过去6个月内的初级保健就诊次数多于未接受抗炎药物治疗的儿童。
询问家长孩子哮喘症状的频率是一种重要、廉价且易于获取的床边和门诊工具,有助于发现持续性症状并指导治疗。我们的研究表明,按照NAEPP指南定义,通过量化持续性哮喘症状来分类哮喘严重程度是一种与哮喘发病率相关的临床有用工具。在我们这个曾因哮喘住院的儿童样本中,83%符合1997年NAEPP持续性哮喘症状标准,但只有35%正在接受每日抗炎药物治疗。抗炎药物的使用与哮喘家庭优质管理的其他指标呈正相关。有必要开展更多工作,以增加该人群中抗炎药物的合理使用,特别是增加对有中度或重度症状儿童的吸入性类固醇使用。