Upshur R E, VanDenKerkhof E G, Goel V
Primary Care Research Unit, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Campus, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2001 May;7(2):91-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00279.x.
Evidence-based approaches are assuming prominence in many health-care fields. The core ideas of evidence-based health care derive from clinical epidemiology and general internal medicine. The concept of evidence has yet to be analysed systematically; what counts as evidence may vary across disciplines. Furthermore, the contribution of the social sciences, particularly qualitative methodology, has received scant attention. This paper outlines a model of evidence that describes four distinct but related types of evidence: qualitative-personal; qualitative-general; quantitative-general and quantitative-personal. The rationale for these distinctions and the implications of these for a theory of evidence are discussed.
循证方法在许多医疗保健领域正日益凸显其重要性。循证医疗的核心思想源自临床流行病学和普通内科医学。证据的概念尚未得到系统分析;不同学科对何为证据的界定可能有所不同。此外,社会科学,尤其是定性研究方法的贡献,受到的关注极少。本文概述了一种证据模型,该模型描述了四种不同但相关的证据类型:定性的个人证据;定性的一般证据;定量的一般证据和定量的个人证据。文中讨论了这些区分的基本原理以及它们对证据理论的影响。