Singh S M, Battista G W, Rustogi K N, DeVizio W, Volpe A R, Petrone M E, Proskin H M
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, USA.
J Clin Dent. 2001;12(3):83-6.
Two independent studies were conducted to evaluate and compare the clinical performance of two commercially available manual toothbrushes (Colgate Total Professional and the Oral-B Cross Action). Study I was a short-term, examiner-blind crossover clinical trial (N = 30) designed to measure the removal of 24-hour plaque build-up. All subjects refrained from brushing for 24 hours and were screened for dental plaque on the facial and lingual surfaces of all natural teeth using the Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index. Patients then received one of the two study toothbrushes and brushed their teeth for a timed one minute. They were then re-assessed for plaque. The data showed that the Colgate Total Professional toothbrush performed better than the Oral-B Cross Action toothbrush in reducing whole-mouth plaque scores (p < 0.001). Study II was a definitive six-week, single-blind clinical trial (N = 55), conducted in harmony with American Dental Association guidelines, to assess the ability of the two toothbrushes to reduce supragingival plaque and gingivitis. In this study, the subjects were stratified into two balanced groups based on their baseline plaque and gingivitis scores. Subjects were then instructed to continue with their normal brushing technique twice daily for one minute with their assigned toothbrush and a commercially available dentifrice. Examinations for plaque (Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index), and gingivitis (Loe-Silness Gingival Index) were conducted by the same examiner at baseline, after three weeks, and again after six weeks. The data from this long-term clinical trial showed that the Colgate Total Professional toothbrush exhibited statistically significantly lower plaque and gingivitis scores than did the Oral-B Cross Action toothbrush. The magnitudes of these differences were 29.5% for plaque and 31.1% for gingivitis. These reductions are adequate to support the claim that the Colgate Total Professional toothbrush provides clinically superior control of supragingival plaque and gingivitis, when studied in accordance with the criteria provided by the 1999 Guidelines of the American Dental Association for determining superiority.
进行了两项独立研究,以评估和比较两种市售手动牙刷(高露洁全效专业型和欧乐 - B交叉动作型)的临床性能。研究I是一项短期、检查者盲法交叉临床试验(N = 30),旨在测量24小时牙菌斑的清除情况。所有受试者24小时不刷牙,使用Rustogi改良海军菌斑指数对所有天然牙的唇面和舌面进行牙菌斑筛查。然后,患者获得两种研究用牙刷中的一种,并定时刷牙一分钟。之后再次对他们进行菌斑评估。数据显示,在降低全口菌斑评分方面,高露洁全效专业型牙刷比欧乐 - B交叉动作型牙刷表现更好(p < 0.001)。研究II是一项为期六周的确定性单盲临床试验(N = 55),按照美国牙科协会的指南进行,以评估这两种牙刷减少龈上菌斑和牙龈炎的能力。在这项研究中,根据受试者的基线菌斑和牙龈炎评分将他们分为两个平衡组。然后指示受试者使用分配给他们的牙刷和一种市售牙膏,按照他们正常的刷牙方法每天刷牙两次,每次一分钟。由同一名检查者在基线、三周后和六周后对菌斑(Rustogi改良海军菌斑指数)和牙龈炎(Loe - Silness牙龈指数)进行检查。这项长期临床试验的数据显示,高露洁全效专业型牙刷的菌斑和牙龈炎评分在统计学上显著低于欧乐 - B交叉动作型牙刷。这些差异的幅度分别为菌斑29.5%,牙龈炎31.1%。当按照美国牙科协会1999年指南提供的确定优越性的标准进行研究时,这些降低幅度足以支持高露洁全效专业型牙刷在临床上对龈上菌斑和牙龈炎具有更好控制效果的说法。