Haley S M, Dumas H M, Ludlow L H
Center for Rehabilitation Effectiveness, Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, 635 Commonwealth Ave, Boston, MA 02215-1605, USA.
Phys Ther. 2001 Aug;81(8):1425-36. doi: 10.1093/ptj/81.8.1425.
The purpose of this study was to describe variation in functional mobility outcomes among children and youth with different diagnoses and belonging to groups with different practice patterns from an inpatient pediatric rehabilitation hospital setting.
A sample of 138 individuals between the ages of 1 and 22 years (mean=9.4, SD=5.3) was enrolled.
Physical therapists administered the "Mobility" domain of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory at the time of admission and at the time of discharge. Mobility level (combined admission and discharge scores) and amount of change between and within 4 diagnostic groups (traumatic brain injury, non-traumatic brain injury, orthopedic, and neurological) and 5 neuromuscular and musculoskeletal practice pattern groups were calculated, and post hoc analyses were done for specific contrast comparisons.
Mobility scores between admission and discharge for all subgroups were different. Practice pattern groups were useful for identifying variations in level of motor performance. Diagnostic groups best described differences in mobility change during inpatient rehabilitation.
The use of practice patterns as grouping categories may enhance our understanding of variation in clinical outcomes of children during inpatient rehabilitation.
本研究旨在描述一家儿科住院康复医院中,不同诊断且属于不同治疗模式组的儿童和青少年在功能活动能力结果方面的差异。
招募了138名年龄在1至22岁之间(平均年龄=9.4,标准差=5.3)的个体。
物理治疗师在入院时和出院时对残疾儿童评定量表的“活动能力”领域进行评估。计算了活动能力水平(入院和出院分数的总和)以及4个诊断组(创伤性脑损伤、非创伤性脑损伤、骨科和神经科)和5个神经肌肉与肌肉骨骼治疗模式组之间及组内的变化量,并针对特定的对比比较进行了事后分析。
所有亚组入院时和出院时的活动能力得分均存在差异。治疗模式组有助于识别运动表现水平的差异。诊断组最能描述住院康复期间活动能力变化的差异。
将治疗模式用作分组类别可能会增进我们对儿童住院康复期间临床结果差异的理解。