Morison L, Scherf C, Ekpo G, Paine K, West B, Coleman R, Walraven G
MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Trop Med Int Health. 2001 Aug;6(8):643-53. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2001.00749.x.
This paper examines the association between traditional practices of female genital cutting (FGC) and adult women's reproductive morbidity in rural Gambia. In 1999, we conducted a cross-sectional community survey of 1348 women aged 15-54 years, to estimate the prevalence of reproductive morbidity on the basis of women's reports, a gynaecological examination and laboratory analysis of specimens. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to compare the prevalence of each morbidity between cut and uncut women adjusting for possible confounders. A total of 1157 women consented to gynaecological examination and 58% had signs of genital cutting. There was a high level of agreement between reported circumcision status and that found on examination (97% agreement). The majority of operations consisted of clitoridectomy and excision of the labia minora (WHO classification type II) and were performed between the ages of 4 and 7 years. The practice of genital cutting was highly associated with ethnic group for two of the three main ethnic groups, making the effects of ethnic group and cutting difficult to distinguish. Women who had undergone FGC had a significantly higher prevalence of bacterial vaginosis (BV) [adjusted odds ratio (OR)=1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-2.18] and a substantially higher prevalence of herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV2) [adjusted OR=4.71; 95% CI 3.46-6.42]. The higher prevalence of HSV2 suggests that cut women may be at increased risk of HIV infection. Commonly cited negative consequences of FGC such as damage to the perineum or anus, vulval tumours (such as Bartholin's cysts and excessive keloid formation), painful sex, infertility, prolapse and other reproductive tract infections (RTIs) were not significantly more common in cut women. The relationship between FGC and long-term reproductive morbidity remains unclear, especially in settings where type II cutting predominates. Efforts to eradicate the practice should incorporate a human rights approach rather than rely solely on the damaging health consequences.
本文探讨了冈比亚农村地区女性生殖器切割(FGC)的传统习俗与成年女性生殖疾病之间的关联。1999年,我们对1348名年龄在15至54岁之间的女性进行了一项横断面社区调查,根据女性的报告、妇科检查以及标本的实验室分析来估计生殖疾病的患病率。采用描述性统计和逻辑回归来比较切割和未切割女性在调整可能的混杂因素后每种疾病的患病率。共有1157名女性同意接受妇科检查,其中58%有生殖器切割的迹象。报告的割礼状况与检查发现的状况之间存在高度一致性(一致性为97%)。大多数手术包括阴蒂切除术和小阴唇切除术(世界卫生组织分类II型),手术在4至7岁之间进行。在三个主要族群中的两个族群中,生殖器切割习俗与族群高度相关,使得族群和切割的影响难以区分。接受过女性生殖器切割的女性患细菌性阴道病(BV)的患病率显著更高[调整后的优势比(OR)=1.66;95%置信区间(CI)1.25 - 2.18],患单纯疱疹病毒2型(HSV2)的患病率也大幅更高[调整后的OR = 4.71;95% CI 3.46 - 6.42]。HSV2患病率较高表明切割女性感染艾滋病毒的风险可能增加。女性生殖器切割常见的负面后果,如会阴或肛门损伤、外阴肿瘤(如巴氏腺囊肿和过度瘢痕疙瘩形成)、性交疼痛、不孕、子宫脱垂和其他生殖道感染(RTIs)在切割女性中并不明显更常见。女性生殖器切割与长期生殖疾病之间的关系仍不明确,尤其是在II型切割占主导的地区。根除这种习俗的努力应纳入人权方法,而不是仅仅依赖于有害的健康后果。