Kleinke J D
Health Strategies Network, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Sep-Oct;20(5):43-60. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.5.43.
Pharmacy costs are rising in excess of general and medical cost inflation, leading to calls for price and utilization controls by public and private payers. Such controls would be ineffective and counterproductive because they would attempt to reverse two profound, historic phenomena at work in the U. S. health care system. The added costs associated with breakthrough medicines represent a major structural shift from the provision of traditional medical services to the consumption of medical products; they also represent the creation of economic, social, and public health utility that we value as a society. The balkanization of medical delivery, institutionalized under traditional reimbursement strategies and galvanized by federal law, does not adequately account for or efficiently accommodate this rotation and increased utility. Federal and state laws regulating health insurance and provider risk sharing need to be revamped to encourage rather than constrain the social progress embodied in expensive, breakthrough medical technologies.
药房成本的增长速度超过了一般医疗成本的通胀速度,这使得公共和私人支付方呼吁对价格和使用进行控制。这种控制将是无效且适得其反的,因为它们试图扭转美国医疗保健系统中正在起作用的两个深刻的历史现象。与突破性药物相关的额外成本代表了从提供传统医疗服务到消费医疗产品的重大结构性转变;它们还代表了我们作为一个社会所重视的经济、社会和公共卫生效用的创造。在传统报销策略下制度化并由联邦法律促成的医疗服务碎片化,无法充分考虑或有效适应这种转变和效用的增加。需要修订规范医疗保险和提供者风险分担的联邦和州法律,以鼓励而非限制昂贵的突破性医疗技术所体现的社会进步。