Shimo Y, Hikosaka O
Department of Physiology, Juntendo University, School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
J Neurosci. 2001 Oct 1;21(19):7804-14. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-19-07804.2001.
Recent studies have suggested that the basal ganglia are essential for reward-oriented behavior. A popular proposal is that the interaction between sensorimotor and reward-related signals occurs in the striatal projection neurons. However, the role of interneurons remains unclear. Using the one-direction-rewarded version of the memory-guided saccade task (1DR), we examined the activity of tonically active neurons (TANs), presumed cholinergic interneurons, in the caudate. Many TANs (73/155, 47.1%) responded, usually with a pause, to a visual cue that indicated both the saccade goal and the presence or absence of reward. For most TANs (44/73, 60.3%), the response was spatially selective (contralateral dominant), but was not modulated by the reward significance. TANs are thus distinct from caudate projection neurons, which have responses to the cue that are both spatially selective and reward contingent, and from midbrain dopamine neurons, which have cue responses that are spatially nonselective and reward contingent. TANs were nonetheless sensitive to the reward schedule: in the all-directions-rewarded version (ADR) compared with 1DR, the cue responses of TANs were smaller, less frequent, and less spatially selective. In 1DR, it would first be detected that reward is not given regularly, and this process would then promote discrimination of individual stimuli in relation to reward. We propose that TANs would contribute to the detection of the context that requires discrimination, whereas dopamine neurons would contribute to the stimulus discrimination. These features of TANs might be explained by their cytoarchitecture, namely, as large aspiny neurons.
近期研究表明,基底神经节对于奖赏导向行为至关重要。一个流行的观点是,感觉运动信号与奖赏相关信号之间的相互作用发生在纹状体投射神经元中。然而,中间神经元的作用仍不清楚。我们使用记忆引导扫视任务的单向奖赏版本(1DR),研究了尾状核中假定为胆碱能中间神经元的紧张性活动神经元(TANs)的活动。许多TANs(73/155,47.1%)对指示扫视目标以及奖赏是否存在的视觉线索有反应,通常表现为暂停。对于大多数TANs(44/73,60.3%),其反应具有空间选择性(对侧占优),但不受奖赏意义的调节。因此,TANs不同于尾状核投射神经元,后者对线索的反应既具有空间选择性又依赖于奖赏,也不同于中脑多巴胺神经元,后者对线索的反应在空间上无选择性但依赖于奖赏。尽管如此,TANs对奖赏模式敏感:与1DR相比,在全向奖赏版本(ADR)中,TANs对线索的反应更小、频率更低且空间选择性更低。在1DR中,首先会检测到奖赏不是定期给予的,然后这个过程会促进对与奖赏相关的单个刺激的辨别。我们提出,TANs有助于检测需要辨别的情境,而多巴胺神经元有助于刺激辨别。TANs的这些特征可能由其细胞结构来解释,即作为大的无棘神经元。