Mattos M A, Sumner D S, Bohannon W T, Parra J, McLafferty R B, Karch L A, Ramsey D E, Hodgson K J
Division of Peripheral Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA.
Ann Surg. 2001 Oct;234(4):438-45; discussion 445-6. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200110000-00003.
To evaluate and compare the short- and long-term outcomes in female and male patients after carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
Randomized carotid trials have clearly shown the benefits of CEA in specific symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. However, the short- and long-term benefits in women appear to be less clear, and the role of CEA among women with carotid disease remains uncertain.
During a 21-year period, 1,204 CEAs were performed, 464 (39%) in women and 739 (61%) in men. Complete follow-up was available in 70% of patients.
Women were less likely to have evidence of coronary artery disease, were more likely to be hypertensive, and had a significantly greater incidence of diabetes. The mean age at CEA was 68.5 +/- 9.5 years for women and 68.0 +/- 8.5 years for men. There were no significant differences in the use of shunts, patching, tacking sutures, or severity of carotid stenoses between men and women. Surgical death rates were nearly identical for asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Perioperative stroke rates were similar for asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Life-table stroke-free rates at 1, 5, and 8 years were similar for asymptomatic women and men and symptomatic women and men. Long-term survival rates at 1, 5, and 8 years were higher for asymptomatic women compared with men and for symptomatic women compared with men. As a result, stroke-free survival rates at these follow-up intervals were greater for asymptomatic women compared with men, and for symptomatic women compared to men.
The results from this study challenge the conclusions from the Asymptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Study and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial regarding the benefits of CEA in women. Female gender did not adversely affect early or late survival, stroke-free, or stroke-free death rates after CEA. The authors conclude that CEA can be performed safely in women with asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid artery disease, and physicians should expect comparable benefits and outcomes in women and men undergoing CEA.
评估和比较颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后女性和男性患者的短期和长期预后。
随机颈动脉试验已明确显示CEA对特定有症状和无症状患者的益处。然而,女性的短期和长期益处似乎不太明确,CEA在患有颈动脉疾病的女性中的作用仍不确定。
在21年期间,共进行了1204例CEA手术,其中女性464例(39%),男性739例(61%)。70%的患者获得了完整的随访。
女性患冠状动脉疾病的证据较少,更易患高血压,糖尿病发病率显著更高。女性CEA手术时的平均年龄为68.5±9.5岁,男性为68.0±8.5岁。男女在使用分流管、补片、固定缝线或颈动脉狭窄严重程度方面无显著差异。无症状和有症状患者的手术死亡率几乎相同。无症状和有症状患者的围手术期卒中发生率相似。无症状女性和男性以及有症状女性和男性在1年、5年和8年的生命表无卒中率相似。无症状女性在1年、5年和8年的长期生存率高于男性,有症状女性也高于男性。因此,在这些随访间隔中,无症状女性的无卒中生存率高于男性,有症状女性也高于男性。
本研究结果对无症状颈动脉内膜切除术研究和北美有症状颈动脉内膜切除术试验关于CEA对女性益处的结论提出了挑战。女性性别并未对CEA后的早期或晚期生存率、无卒中率或无卒中死亡率产生不利影响。作者得出结论,CEA可安全地用于患有无症状和有症状颈动脉疾病的女性,医生应预期接受CEA的女性和男性会有相当的益处和预后。